Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery
Volume 49, Issue 4 , Pages 375-379, July 2010

A Retrospective Analysis of Anterior Calcaneal Osteotomy with Allogenic Bone Graft

  • Shine John, DPM

      Affiliations

    • Resident, Department of Foot and Ankle Surgery, The Western Pennsylvania Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA
  • ,
  • Brandon J. Child, DPM

      Affiliations

    • Resident, Department of Foot and Ankle Surgery, The Western Pennsylvania Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA
  • ,
  • Joel Hix, DPM

      Affiliations

    • Resident, Department of Foot and Ankle Surgery, The Western Pennsylvania Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA
  • ,
  • Michael Maskill, DPM

      Affiliations

    • Resident, Department of Foot and Ankle Surgery, The Western Pennsylvania Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA
  • ,
  • Cody Bowers, DPM

      Affiliations

    • Resident, Department of Foot and Ankle Surgery, The Western Pennsylvania Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA
  • ,
  • Alan R. Catanzariti, DPM, FACFAS

      Affiliations

    • Director of Residency Training, Department of Foot and Ankle Surgery, The Western Pennsylvania Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA
  • ,
  • Robert W. Mendicino, DPM, FACFAS

      Affiliations

    • Chairman, Department of Foot and Ankle Surgery, The Western Pennsylvania Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: Robert Mendicino, DPM, FACFAS, The Foot and Ankle Institute of Western Pennsylvania, 4800 Friendship Ave, North Tower, First Floor, Pittsburgh, PA 15224.
  • ,
  • Karl Saltrick, DPM, FACFAS

      Affiliations

    • Assistant Director of Residency Training, Department of Foot and Ankle Surgery, The Western Pennsylvania Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA

published online 12 April 2010.

Abstract 

Anterior calcaneal osteotomy (ACO) with extension bone graft is commonly employed in the treatment of symptomatic supple, hypermobile flatfoot in adolescent as well as adult (≥ 18 years of age) patients. Although autogenous bone graft has been considered the gold standard, allogenic bone is widely used for this procedure because it is readily available, requires no additional procedure for procurement and has incorporation rates similar to autogenous bone graft. There is increasing agreement among surgeons that the union rates with allograft bone are comparable with that observed with autograft bone when used in the ACO. We reviewed the medical records of 51 consecutive patients who had undergone 53 ACO with allogenic bone graft for the repair of flatfoot deformity in an effort to further evaluate outcomes associated with the use of allogenic bone graft. All of the patients had at least 12 months of follow-up. The mean time to graft incorporation was 9.10 ± 1.54 weeks for adolescents and 9.81 ± 2.13 weeks for adults (P = .0149), The incidence of graft incorporation (bone union) was 100% and 90% (P = .1391) in the adolescent and adult groups, respectively. Complications included lateral column pain, sinus tarsitis, nonunion, calcaneocuboid capsulitis, complex regional pain syndrome, incisional dehiscence, and sural neuritis; and all of the complications occurred in the adult group. The results support the understanding that ACO with allogenic bone graft is a reasonable alternative to autograft bone graft in the treatment of flexible flatfoot in adolescent and adult patients.

Level of Clinical Evidence: 2

Keywords: autogenous, cortical, freeze-dried, surgery, tibia, tricortical

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 25.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Financial Disclosure: None reported.

 Conflict of Interest: None reported.

PII: S1067-2516(09)00515-8

doi:10.1053/j.jfas.2009.12.007

Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery
Volume 49, Issue 4 , Pages 375-379, July 2010