Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery
Volume 44, Issue 6 , Pages 450-454, November 2005

Implantable Electrical Bone Stimulation for Arthrodeses of the Foot and Ankle in High-Risk Patients: A Multicenter Study

  • Amol Saxena, DPM (FACFAS)

      Affiliations

    • Department of Sports Medicine, Palo Alto Medical Foundation, Palo Alto, CA.
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: Amol Saxena, DPM, FACFAS, Dept. of Sports Medicine, Palo Alto Medical Foundation, 795 El Camino Real, Palo Alto, CA 94301.
  • ,
  • Lawrence A. DiDomenico, DPM (FACFAS)

      Affiliations

    • Beeghly Medical Park, Youngstown, OH.
  • ,
  • Arthur Widtfeldt, DPM (FACFAS)

      Affiliations

    • Department of Podiatry, Palo Alto Medical Foundation, Palo Alto, CA.
  • ,
  • Todd Adams, DPM

      Affiliations

    • Resident, Youngtown Residency Program, Northside Medical Center, Youngstown, OH.
  • ,
  • Will Kim, DPM

      Affiliations

    • Deceased; Fellow, Departments of Sports Medicine & Podiatry, Palo Alto Medical Foundation, Palo Alto, CA.

This study assessed arthrodesis procedures performed in the foot and ankle of high-risk patients following implantation of an internal electrical bone stimulator. Criteria defining patients as “high risk” included diabetes, obesity, habitual tobacco and/or alcohol use, immunosuppressive therapy, and previous history of nonunion. Standard arthrodesis protocol of bone graft and internal fixation was supplemented with the implantable electrical bone stimulator. A retrospective, multicenter review was conducted of 26 patients (28 cases) who underwent 28 forefoot and hindfoot arthrodeses from 1998 to 2002. Complete fusion was defined as bony trabeculation across the joint, lack of motion across the joint, maintenance of hardware/fixation, and absence of radiographic signs of nonunion or pseudoarthrosis. Radiographic consolidation was achieved in 24 of the 28 cases at an average 10.3 ± 4.0 weeks. Followup averaged 27.2 months. Complications included 2 patients who sustained breakage of the cables to the bone stimulator. Five patients underwent additional surgery. Four of the 5 patients had additional surgery in order to achieve arthrodesis. All 4 went on to subsequent arthrodesis. This study demonstrates how arthrodesis of the foot and ankle may be enhanced by the use of implantable electrical bone stimulation.

Key words:  arthrodesis , foot , ankle , electrical bone stimulation , nonunion

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 25.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 None of the authors reported a conflict of interest with the products cited in this manuscript.

PII: S1067-2516(05)00477-1

doi:10.1053/j.jfas.2005.07.018

Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery
Volume 44, Issue 6 , Pages 450-454, November 2005