Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery
Volume 48, Issue 1 , Pages 39-46, January 2009

Combined Clinical and Laboratory Testing Improves Diagnostic Accuracy for Osteomyelitis in the Diabetic Foot

  • Adam E. Fleischer, DPM, MPH

      Affiliations

    • Assistant Professor of Radiology, Scholl College of Podiatric Medicine at Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, North Chicago, IL
    • Department of Surgery, Advocate Illinois Masonic Medical Center, Chicago, IL
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: Adam E. Fleischer, DPM, MPH, FACFAS, Scholl College of Podiatric Medicine at Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, 3471 Green Bay Road, North Chicago, IL 60064
  • ,
  • Adam A. Didyk, DPM

      Affiliations

    • Attending Staff, Arlington USMD Surgical Hospital, Arlington TX
  • ,
  • Jason B. Woods, BS

      Affiliations

    • Podiatric Medical Student, Scholl College of Podiatric Medicine at Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, North Chicago, IL
  • ,
  • Sarah E. Burns, BS

      Affiliations

    • Podiatric Medical Student, Scholl College of Podiatric Medicine at Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, North Chicago, IL
  • ,
  • James S. Wrobel, DPM, MS

      Affiliations

    • Associate Professor of Medicine and Director, Scholl's Center for Lower Extremity Ambulatory Research (CLEAR), Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, North Chicago, IL
  • ,
  • David G. Armstrong, DPM, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Professor of Surgery and Director, Southern Arizona Limb Salvage Alliance (SALSA), University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, AZ

published online 14 November 2008.

The purpose of this investigation was to examine the value of using routinely available clinical and laboratory tests in combination to distinguish osteomyelitis from cellulitis in a diabetic population with mild to moderately infected forefoot ulcers. We conducted a case-control study of 54 diabetic patients with 54 locally infected ulcers admitted to a university-affiliated tertiary-care hospital over a 4.5-year period. A total of 30 clinical and laboratory characteristics obtained at admission were tested for their association with pathology-proven osteomyelitis using logistic regression techniques. Ulcer depth greater than 3 mm (univariate odds ratio 10.4, P = .001) and C-reactive protein greater than 3.2 mg/dL (univariate odds ratio 10.8, P < .001) were the most informative individual clinical and laboratory tests for differentiating osteomyelitis from cellulitis. Adding C-reactive protein also significantly improved upon the accuracy of the study's best clinical testing strategy (area under the curve improved from 0.80 to 0.88, P = .040). Strategies that combined ulcer depth with serum inflammatory markers proved most useful in detecting ulcerated patients with concomitant bone infections (sensitivity 100% [95% CI 89.7%–100%] for both ulcer depth greater than 3 mm or C-reactive protein greater than 3.2 mg/dL, and ulcer depth greater than 3 mm or erythrocyte sedimentation rate greater than 60 mm/h). We conclude that considering clinical and laboratory findings together can significantly improve our diagnostic accuracy for osteomyelitis in the diabetic foot. The specific combination of ulcer depth with serum inflammatory markers appears to be a particularly sensitive strategy that may allow for greater detection of early diabetic osteomyelitis. Level of Clinical Evidence: 3

Key Words: C-reactive protein, case control study, diabetic foot infection, diagnosis, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, osteomyelitis, ulcer

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 25.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Financial Disclosure: None reported.

 Conflict of Interest: None reported.

PII: S1067-2516(08)00371-2

doi:10.1053/j.jfas.2008.09.003

Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery
Volume 48, Issue 1 , Pages 39-46, January 2009