Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery
Volume 49, Issue 4 , Pages 331-339 , July 2010

A Retrospective Cohort Study of the BioPro® Hemiarthroplasty Prosthesis

  • Christine C. Salonga, DPM

      Affiliations

    • Chief Resident, Podiatric Surgery, Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT
  • ,
  • David C. Novicki, DPM, FACFAS

      Affiliations

    • Clinical Assistant Professor, Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
  • ,
  • Martin M. Pressman, DPM, FACFAS

      Affiliations

    • Clinical Assistant Professor, Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Yale School of Medicine, Section Chief of Podiatry, Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: Martin M. Pressman, DPM, FACFAS, Yale New Haven Hospital, Department of Orthopaedics, 800 Howard Ave, New Haven, CT 06511.
  • ,
  • D. Scot Malay, DPM, MSCE, FACFAS

      Affiliations

    • Director of Podiatric Research, Penn Presbyterian Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA

References 

  1. Taranow WS, Townley C. Metallic proximal phalangeal hemiarthroplasty for hallux rigidus. Op Tech Orthop. 1999;9(1):33–37
  2. Pressman MM, Stano GW, Kranz MK, Novicki DC. Correction of hallux valgus with positionally increased intermetatarsal angle. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 1986;76:611–616
  3. Townley CO, Taranow WS. A metallic hemiarthroplasty resurfacing prosthesis for the hallux metatarsophalangeal joint. Foot Ankle Int. 1994;15(11):575–580
  4. Drago JJ, Oloff L, Jacobs AM. A comprehensive review of hallux limitus. J Foot Surg. 1984;23:213–220
  5. Pressman M, Novicki DC. The challenge of hallux limitus: profiles in ex 2002. Podiatry Manage. 2002;
  6. Thomas JL, Christensen JC, Mendicino RW, Schuberth JM, Weil LS, Zlotoff HJ, et al. The American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons (ACFAS). ACFAS Scoring Scale user guide. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2005;44(5):316–335
  7. Begaud B, Moride Y, Tubert-Bitter P, Chaslerie A, Haramburu F. False-positives in spontaneous reporting: should we worry about them?. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1994;38:401–404
  8. Maldonado G, Greenland S. Simulation study of confounder-selection strategies. Am J Epidemiol. 1993;138:923–936
  9. Karbowski A, Schwitalle M, Eckhardt A. Arthroplasty of the forefoot in rheumatoid arthritis: long-term results after Clayton procedure. Acta Orthop Belg. 1998;64(4):401–405
  10. Schneider W, Knahr K. Surgery for hallux valgus. The expectations of patients and surgeons. Int Orthop. 2001;25(6):382–385
  11. Roukis TS, Townley CO. BIOPRO resurfacing endoprosthesis versus periarticular osteotomy for hallux rigidus: short term follow-up and analysis. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2003;42(6):350–358
  12. Leavitt KM, Nirenberg MS, Wood B, Yong RM. Titanium hemi-great toe implant: a preliminary study of its efficacy. TJ Foot Surg. 1991;30(3):289–293
  13. Goez J, Townley C, Taranow WS. An update on the metallic hemiarthroplasty resurfacing prosthesis for the hallux. 56th Annual Meeting and Scientific Seminar of ACFAS, Orlando, 1998.
  14. Joplin RJ. The proper digital nerve, Vitallium stem arthroplasty and some thoughts about foot surgery in general. Clin Orthop. 1971;76:199–212

 Financial Disclosure: None reported.

 Conflict of Interest: David C. Novicki, DPM, periodically gives lectures for Biopro about first MTPJ implants.

PII: S1067-2516(09)00511-0

doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2009.12.003

Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery
Volume 49, Issue 4 , Pages 331-339 , July 2010