Advertisement
Original Research| Volume 49, ISSUE 4, P331-339, July 2010

A Retrospective Cohort Study of the BioPro® Hemiarthroplasty Prosthesis

Published:April 26, 2010DOI:https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2009.12.003

      Abstract

      We reviewed the outcomes of 79 procedures in 76 patients who underwent first metatarsophalangeal joint hemiarthroplasty. The cohort included 23 men (2 bilateral cases) and 53 women (1 bilateral case), with a mean age of 59.6 ± 11.05 years and a mean follow-up of 2.91 years (range, 1.6-4.5 years). Hemiarthroplasty with the BioPro Hemi Implant (BioPro, Inc., Port Huron, MI) was undertaken in all cases, and 34 (43.04%) of the procedures involved long flexor transfer to the proximal phalanx. Mean first metatarsophalangeal joint dorsiflexion increased from 36.13° ± 17.89° to 56.92° ± 9.82° (P < .0001), plantarflexion increased from 2.71° ± 8.43° to 9.05° ± 4.52° (P < .0001), the first intermetatarsal angle decreased from 8.65° ± 1.17° to 8.41° ± 0.90° (P = .0009), and the prevalence of first-ray elevatus went from 52 (65.82%) to 44 (55.70%) (P = .0047). Postoperative prevalences included: antalgic gait, 11 (13.92%); normal hallux purchase, 74 (93.67%); satisfaction with the appearance of the great toe, 49 (62.03%); ability to wear conventional shoes, 42 (53.16%); freedom from pain, 45 (56.96%); and satisfaction or high level of satisfaction with the outcome, 68 (86.08%). The mean postoperative American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons Universal Evaluation score was 94.00 (range, 44-100). Eight (10.13%) cases experienced complications: 2 severe pain (1 required implant removal), 1 sesamoiditis, 1 extensor hallucis longus contracture, 1 hallux subluxation and 1 dislocation, and 2 misaligned implants. Based on these results, use of the BioPro hemi-implant is a useful option for the treatment of first metatarsophalangeal joint degeneration.

      Level of Clinical Evidence

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Taranow W.S.
        • Townley C.
        Metallic proximal phalangeal hemiarthroplasty for hallux rigidus.
        Op Tech Orthop. 1999; 9: 33-37
        • Pressman M.M.
        • Stano G.W.
        • Kranz M.K.
        • Novicki D.C.
        Correction of hallux valgus with positionally increased intermetatarsal angle.
        J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 1986; 76: 611-616
        • Townley C.O.
        • Taranow W.S.
        A metallic hemiarthroplasty resurfacing prosthesis for the hallux metatarsophalangeal joint.
        Foot Ankle Int. 1994; 15: 575-580
        • Drago J.J.
        • Oloff L.
        • Jacobs A.M.
        A comprehensive review of hallux limitus.
        J Foot Surg. 1984; 23: 213-220
        • Pressman M.
        • Novicki D.C.
        The challenge of hallux limitus: profiles in ex 2002.
        Podiatry Manage. 2002;
        • Thomas J.L.
        • Christensen J.C.
        • Mendicino R.W.
        • Schuberth J.M.
        • Weil Sr, L.S.
        • Zlotoff H.J.
        • Roukis T.S.
        • Vanore J.V.
        The American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons (ACFAS). ACFAS Scoring Scale user guide.
        J Foot Ankle Surg. 2005; 44: 316-335
        • Begaud B.
        • Moride Y.
        • Tubert-Bitter P.
        • Chaslerie A.
        • Haramburu F.
        False-positives in spontaneous reporting: should we worry about them?.
        Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1994; 38: 401-404
        • Maldonado G.
        • Greenland S.
        Simulation study of confounder-selection strategies.
        Am J Epidemiol. 1993; 138: 923-936
        • Karbowski A.
        • Schwitalle M.
        • Eckhardt A.
        Arthroplasty of the forefoot in rheumatoid arthritis: long-term results after Clayton procedure.
        Acta Orthop Belg. 1998; 64: 401-405
        • Schneider W.
        • Knahr K.
        Surgery for hallux valgus. The expectations of patients and surgeons.
        Int Orthop. 2001; 25: 382-385
        • Roukis T.S.
        • Townley C.O.
        BIOPRO resurfacing endoprosthesis versus periarticular osteotomy for hallux rigidus: short term follow-up and analysis.
        J Foot Ankle Surg. 2003; 42: 350-358
        • Leavitt K.M.
        • Nirenberg M.S.
        • Wood B.
        • Yong R.M.
        Titanium hemi-great toe implant: a preliminary study of its efficacy.
        TJ Foot Surg. 1991; 30: 289-293
      1. Goez J, Townley C, Taranow WS. An update on the metallic hemiarthroplasty resurfacing prosthesis for the hallux. 56th Annual Meeting and Scientific Seminar of ACFAS, Orlando, 1998.

        • Joplin R.J.
        The proper digital nerve, Vitallium stem arthroplasty and some thoughts about foot surgery in general.
        Clin Orthop. 1971; 76: 199-212