Original Research| Volume 49, ISSUE 6, P523-528, November 2010

Radiographic Angles in Hallux Valgus: Comparison between Manual and Computer-Assisted Measurements


      Radiographic angles are used to assess the severity of hallux valgus deformity, in preoperative planning, assessing postoperative outcomes, and in comparing results between interventions. The manual method to measure these angles has been shown to be prone to errors and to be time consuming. Computer programs are now available to assist in angular measurements.
      This study was undertaken to compare the reliability and time taken between the 2 methods. A total of 30 radiographs were used from a population of patients with hallux valgus deformity. The radiographs were digitized for computer-assisted measurements. The technical error of measurement (TEM) was calculated for intra- and interobserver data to assess the error in angular measurement with both methods.
      The technical error of measurement was lower with the computer-assisted method, suggesting that this method is more reliable. Furthermore, the time taken was also reduced with this method.)

      Level of Clinical Evidence


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Saltzman C.
        • Brandser E.
        • Berbaum K.
        • DeGnore L.
        • Holmes J.
        • Katcherian D.
        • Teadsall R.
        • Alexander I.
        Reliability of standard foot radiographic measurements.
        Foot Ankle. 1994; 15: 661-665
        • Resch S.
        • Ryd L.
        • Stenstorm A.
        • Johnson K.
        • Raynisson K.
        Measuring hallux valgus: a comparision of conventional radiography and clinical parameters with regard to measurement accuracy.
        Foot Ankle. 1995; 16: 267-270
        • Schneider W.
        • Knahr K.
        Metatarsophalangeal and intermetetarsal angle: different values and interpretation of postoperative results dependent on the technique of measurement.
        Foot Ankle. 1998; 19: 532-536
        • Coughlin M.J.
        • Freund E.
        The reliability of angular measurements in hallux valgus deformities.
        Foot Ankle. 2001; 22: 369-379
        • Condon F.
        • Kaliszer M.
        • Conhyea D.
        • O'Donnell T.
        • Shaju A.
        • Masterson E.
        The first metatarsal angle in hallux valgus: an analysis of measurement reliability and the error involved.
        Foot Ankle. 2002; 22: 717-721
        • Schneider W.
        • Csepan R.
        • Kasparek M.
        • Pinggera O.
        • Knahr K.
        Intra and interobserver repeatability of radiographic measurements in hallux surgery.
        Acta Orthop Scand. 2002; 6: 670-673
        • Shea K.G.
        • Stevens P.M.
        • Nelson M.
        • Smith J.T.
        • Masters K.S.
        • Yandow S.
        A comparision of manual versus computer-assisted radiographic measurement. Intraobserver measurement variability for Cobb angles.
        Spine. 1998; 23: 551-555
        • Chockalingam N.
        • Dangerfield P.H.
        • Giakas G.
        • Cochrane T.
        • Dorgan J.C.
        Computer assisted Cobb measurement of scoliosis.
        Eur Spine J. 2002; 11: 353-357
        • Panchbhavi V.K.
        • Trevino S.
        Comparision between manual and computer assisted measurements of hallux valgus parameters.
        Foot Ankle. 2004; 25: 709-711
        • Farber D.C.
        • DeOrio J.K.
        • Steel M.W.
        Goniometric versus computerised angle measurement in assessing hallux valgus.
        Foot Ankle. 2005; 26: 234-238
        • Piqué-Vidal C.
        • Maled-Garcia I.
        • Arabi-Moreno J.
        • B-Stat J.V.
        Radiographic angles in hallux valgus: differences between measurements made manually and with a computerised program.
        Foot Ankle. 2006; 27: 175-180
        • Coughlin M.J.
        • Saltzman C.L.
        • Nunley J.A.
        Angular measurements in the evaluation of halluxvalgus deformities: A report of the Ad Hoc committee of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society on angular measurements.
        Foot Ankle. 2002; 23: 68-74
        • Mueller W.H.
        • Martorell R.
        Reliability and accuracy of measurement.
        in: Lohman T.G. Roache A.F. Martorell R. editors Anthropometric Standardisation Reference Manual. Human Kinetics Books, Champaign, IL1988: 83-86
        • Ulijaszek S.
        • Lourie J.
        Intra and inter observer error in measurement.
        in: Ulijasezek S. Anthropometry: The Individual and the Population. Cambridge University Press, 1994: 30-55
        • Vittetoe D.
        • Saltzman C.
        • Krieg J.
        • Brown T.
        Reliability and validity of distal metatarsal articular angle.
        Foot Ankle. 1994; 15: 541-547
        • Chi T.D.
        • Davitt J.
        • Younger A.
        • Holt S.
        • Sangeorzan B.J.
        Intra- and Inter-observer reliability of the distal metatarsal articular angle in hallux valgus.
        Foot Ankle. 2002; 22: 722-726
        • Robinson A.H.
        • Cullen N.P.
        • Chhaya N.C.
        • Sri-Ram K.
        • Lynch A.
        Variation of the distal metatarsal articular angle with axial rotation and inclination of the first metatarsal.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2006; 27: 1036-1040
        • Smith R.W.
        • Reynolds J.C.
        • Stewart M.J.
        Hallux valgus assessment: report of research committee of American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society.
        Foot Ankle. 1984; 5: 92-103
        • Shima H.
        • Okuda R.
        • Yasuda T.
        • Jotoku T.
        • Kitano N.
        • Kinoshita M.
        Radiographic measurements in patients with hallux valgus before and after proximal crescentic osteotomy.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009; A91: 1369-1376
        • Ackerman S.J.
        • Gitlin J.N.
        • Gayler R.W.
        • Flagle C.D.
        • Bryan R.N.
        Reciever operating characteristic analysis of fracture and pneumonia detection: comparision of laser-digitised workstation images and conventional analog radiographs.
        Radiology. 1993; 186: 263-268
        • Hamers S.
        • Freyschmidt J.
        • Neitzel U.
        Digital radiography with a large-scale electronic flat-panel dtector vs screen film radiography: observer preference in clinical skeletal diagnostics.
        Eur Radiol. 2001; 11: 1753-1759
        • Grainger J.
        • Duryea J.
        • Elliott J.M.
        • Genant H.K.
        The evaluation of a new digital semi-automated system for the radiological assessment of distal radial fractures.
        Skeletal Radiol. 2002; 31: 457-463