Advertisement
Original Research| Volume 51, ISSUE 1, P30-33, January 2012

Incorporation of Bovine-based Structural Bone Grafts Used in Reconstructive Foot Surgery

  • Naohiro Shibuya
    Correspondence
    Address correspondence to: Naohiro Shibuya, DPM, MS, FACFAS, Department of Surgery, Texas A&M Health Science Center, College of Medicine, Central Texas Veterans Health Care System, Scott and White Memorial Hospital System, Temple, TX 76502.
    Affiliations
    Associate Professor, Department of Surgery, Texas A&M Health Science Center, College of Medicine; Central Texas Veterans Health Care System; and Scott and White Memorial Hospital System, Temple, TX
    Search for articles by this author
  • Daniel C. Jupiter
    Affiliations
    Assistant Professor and Research Scientist, Department of Surgery, Texas A&M Health Science Center, College of Medicine; and Department of Surgery, Scott and White Memorial Hospital, Temple, TX
    Search for articles by this author
  • Lacey D. Clawson
    Affiliations
    Second-Year Podiatric Medicine and Surgery Resident, Scott and White Memorial Hospital, Texas A&M Health Science Center, College of Medicine, Temple, TX
    Search for articles by this author
  • Javier La Fontaine
    Affiliations
    Associate Professor, Department of Surgery, Texas A&M Health Science Center, College of Medicine; Chief, Section of Podiatry, Central Texas Veterans Health Care System; and Scott and White Memorial Hospital System, Temple, TX
    Search for articles by this author
Published:October 31, 2011DOI:https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2011.09.008

      Abstract

      Timely incorporation of bone grafts is essential to the structural rigidity in most foot and ankle surgeries. Although bovine-based xenografts possess some of the key features necessary for foot and ankle surgery, the studies evaluating the efficacy of these grafts are limited. The aim of the present study was to determine the incorporation rate of bovine-based bone grafts in foot surgery. A total of 22 patients who had undergone reconstructive foot surgery using 31 bovine-based xenografts were identified, and the rate of radiographic incorporation of the grafts was evaluated. A survival analysis was used to show the trend of the incorporation of the xenografts over time. Of the 21 grafts observed for at least 12 weeks, none showed radiographic graft incorporation by 12 weeks. The analogous numbers for 24, 36, and 48 weeks were 3 (20%) of 15, 4 (31%) of 13, and 3 (27%) of 11 grafts. A total of 19 (61.29%) of the 31 grafts studied were never observed to have incorporated radiographically, for the entire observation period. A Kaplan-Meier estimate revealed the median interval to graft incorporation was 56 weeks. Compared with previous studies, which investigated the incorporation of other types of grafts, such as autograft and allografts, we believe that xenografts incorporate more slowly. For this reason, such grafts might not be ideal for use in reconstructive foot surgery.

      Level of Clinical Evidence

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Bingold A.C.
        Ankle and subtalar fusion by a transarticular graft.
        J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1956; 38-B: 862-870
        • Chuinard E.G.
        • Peterson R.E.
        Distraction-compression bone-graft arthrodesis of the ankle: a method especially applicable in children.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1963; 45-A: 481-490
        • Enneking W.F.
        • Morris J.L.
        Human autologous cortical bone transplants.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1972; 87: 28-35
        • McCall R.E.
        • Lillich J.S.
        • Harris J.R.
        • Johnston F.A.
        The Grice extraarticular subtalar arthrodesis: a clinical review.
        J Pediatr Orthop. 1985; 5: 442-445
        • Taheri Z.E.
        • Gueramy M.
        Experience with calf bone in cervical interbody spinal fusion.
        J Neurosurg. 1972; 36: 67-71
        • Bansal M.R.
        • Bhagat S.B.
        • Shukla D.D.
        Bovine cancellous xenograft in the treatment of tibial plateau fractures in elderly patients.
        Int Orthop. 2009; 33: 779-784
        • Taheri M.
        • Molla R.
        • Radvar M.
        • Sohrabi K.
        • Najafi M.H.
        An evaluation of bovine derived xenograft with and without a bioabsorbable collagen membrane in the treatment of mandibular class II furcation defects.
        Aust Dent J. 2009; 54: 220-227
        • Corrales L.A.
        • Morshed S.
        • Bhandari M.
        • Miclau III, T.
        Variability in the assessment of fracture-healing in orthopaedic trauma studies.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008; 90: 1862-1868
        • Stevens K.J.
        • Banuls M.
        Sciatic nerve palsy caused by haematoma from iliac bone graft donor site.
        Eur Spine J. 1994; 3: 291-293
        • Banwart J.C.
        • Asher M.A.
        • Hassanein R.S.
        Iliac crest bone graft harvest donor site morbidity: a statistical evaluation.
        Spine. 1995; 20: 1055-1060
        • Schulhofer S.D.
        • Oloff L.M.
        Iliac crest donor site morbidity in foot and ankle surgery.
        J Foot Ankle Surg. 1997; 36: 155-158
        • Cricchio G.
        • Lundgren S.
        Donor site morbidity in two different approaches to anterior iliac crest bone harvesting.
        Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2003; 5: 161-169
        • Chou L.B.
        • Mann R.A.
        • Coughlin M.J.
        • McPeake III, W.T.
        • Mizel M.S.
        Stress fracture as a complication of autogenous bone graft harvest from the distal tibia.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2007; 28: 199-201
        • Mahan K.T.
        • Hillstrom H.J.
        Bone grafting in foot and ankle surgery: a review of 300 cases.
        J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 1998; 88: 109-118
        • Dolan C.M.
        • Henning J.A.
        • Anderson J.G.
        • Bohay D.R.
        • Kornmesser M.J.
        • Endres T.J.
        Randomized prospective study comparing tri-cortical iliac crest autograft to allograft in the lateral column lengthening component for operative correction of adult acquired flatfoot deformity.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2007; 28: 8-12
        • McCormack A.P.
        • Niki H.
        • Kiser P.
        • Tencer A.F.
        • Sangeorzan B.J.
        Two reconstructive techniques for flatfoot deformity comparing contact characteristics of the hindfoot joints.
        Foot Ankle Int. 1998; 19: 452-461
        • Danko A.M.
        • Allen Jr., B.
        • Pugh L.
        • Stasikelis P.
        Early graft failure in lateral column lengthening.
        J Pediatr Orthop. 2004; 24: 716-720
        • Schwarz F.
        • Ferrari D.
        • Balic E.
        • Buser D.
        • Becker J.
        • Sager M.
        Lateral ridge augmentation using equine- and bovine-derived cancellous bone blocks: a feasibility study in dogs.
        Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010; 21: 904-912
        • John S.
        • Child B.J.
        • Hix J.
        • Maskill M.
        • Bowers C.
        • Catanzariti A.R.
        • Mendicino R.W.
        • Saltrick K.
        A retrospective analysis of anterior calcaneal osteotomy with allogenic bone graft.
        J Foot Ankle Surg. 2010; 49: 375-379
        • Nowicki P.D.
        • Tylkowski C.M.
        • Iwinski H.J.
        • Talwalkar V.
        • Walker J.L.
        • Milbrandt T.A.
        Structural bone allograft in pediatric foot surgery.
        Am J Orthop. 2010; 39: 238-240
        • Philbin T.M.
        • Pokabla C.
        • Berlet G.C.
        Lateral column lengthening using allograft interposition and cervical plate fixation.
        Foot Ankle Spec. 2008; 1: 288-296