Original Research| Volume 51, ISSUE 6, P762-766, November 2012

Single-row Versus Double-row Repair of the Distal Achilles Tendon: A Biomechanical Comparison

Published:August 06, 2012DOI:


      Surgery for recalcitrant insertional Achilles tendinopathy often consists of partial or total release of the insertion site, debridement of the diseased portion of the tendon, calcaneal ostectomy, and reattachment of the Achilles to the calcaneus. Although single-row and double-row techniques exist for repair of the detached Achilles tendon, biomechanical data are lacking to support one technique over the other. Based on data extrapolated from the study of rotator cuff repairs, we hypothesized that a double-row construct would provide superior fixation strength over a single-row repair. Eighteen human cadaveric Achilles tendons (9 matched pairs) with attached calcanei were repaired with single-row or double-row techniques. Specimens were mounted in a servohydraulic materials testing machine, subjected to a preconditioning cycle, and loaded to failure. Failure was defined as suture breakage or pullout, midsubstance tendon rupture, or anchor pullout. Among the failures were 12 suture failures, 5 proximal-row anchor failures, and 1 distal-row anchor failure. No midsubstance tendon ruptures or testing apparatus failures were observed. There were no statistically significant differences in the peak load to failure between the single-row and double-row repairs (p = .46). Similarly, no significant differences were observed with regards to mean energy expenditure to failure (p = .069). The present study demonstrated no biomechanical advantages of the double-row repair over a single-row repair. Despite the lack of a clear biomechanical advantage, there may exist clinical advantages of a double-row repair, such as reduction in knot prominence and restoration of the Achilles footprint.

      Level of Clinical Evidence


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Kvist M.
        Achilles tendon injuries in athletes.
        Ann Chir Gynaecol. 1991; 80: 188-201
        • McGarvey W.C.
        • Palumbo R.C.
        • Baxter D.E.
        • Leibman B.D.
        Insertion Achilles tendinosis: surgical treatment through a central tendon splitting approach.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2002; 23: 19-25
        • Leitze Z.
        • Sella E.J.
        • Aversa J.M.
        Endoscopic decompression of the retrocalcaneal space.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003; 85: 1488-1496
        • Ortmann F.W.
        • McBryde A.M.
        Endoscopic bony and soft-tissue decompression of the retrocalcaneal space for the treatment of Haglund deformity and retrocalcaneal bursitis.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2007; 28: 149-153
        • DeOrio M.J.
        • Easley M.E.
        Surgical strategies: insertional Achilles tendinopathy.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2008; 29: 542-550
        • Johnson K.W.
        • Zalavras C.
        • Thordarson D.B.
        Surgical management of insertional calcific Achilles tendinosis with a central tendon splitting approach.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2006; 27: 245-250
        • Maffulli N.
        • Testa V.
        • Capasso G.
        • Sullo A.
        Calcific insertional Achilles tendinopathy: reattachment with bone anchors.
        Am J Sports Med. 2004; 32: 174-182
        • Nunley J.A.
        • Ruskin G.
        • Horst F.
        Long-term clinical outcomes following the central incision technique for insertional Achilles tendinopathy.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2011; 32: 850-855
        • Schepsis A.A.
        • Leach R.E.
        Surgical management of Achilles tendinitis.
        Am J Sports Med. 1987; 15: 308-315
        • Watson A.D.
        • Anderson R.B.
        • Davis W.H.
        Comparison of results of retrocalcaneal decompression for retrocalcaneal bursitis and insertional Achilles tendinosis with calcific spur.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2000; 21: 638-642
        • Yodlowski M.
        • Scheller A.D.
        • Minos L.
        Surgical treatment of Achilles tendinitis by decompression of the retrocalcaneal bursa and the superior calcaneal tuberosity.
        Am J Sports Med. 2002; 30: 318-321
        • Wagner E.
        • Gould J.S.
        • Kneidel M.
        • Fleisig G.S.
        • Fowler R.
        Technique and results of Achilles tendon detachment and reconstruction for insertional Achilles tendinosis.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2006; 27: 677-684
        • Meier S.W.
        • Meier J.D.
        Rotator cuff repair: the effect of double-row fixation on three-dimensional repair site.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2006; 15: 691-696
        • Papalia R.
        • Franceschi F.
        • Del Buono A.
        • Zampogna B.
        • Maffulli N.
        • Denaro V.
        Double row repair: is it worth the hassle?.
        Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2011; 19: 342-347
      1. Amendola N, Boyle J, Mazzocca A, Obopilwe E, Rincon L, McWilliam J, Dhar Y. Biomechanical testing of distal Achilles fixation using suture anchors: single row vs. SutureBridge™. Arthrex®, Inc. Company Literature, 2007. Available at: Accessed July 5, 2012.

        • Moon D.K.
        • Woo S.L.
        • Takakura Y.
        • Gabriel M.T.
        • Abramowitch S.D.
        The effects of refreezing on the viscoelastic and tensile properties of ligaments.
        J Biomech. 2006; 39: 1153-1157
        • Maffulli N.
        Rupture of the Achilles tendon.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999; 81: 1019-1036
        • Kim D.H.
        • Elattrache N.S.
        • Tibone J.E.
        • Jun B.J.
        • DeLaMora S.N.
        • Kvitne R.S.
        • Lee T.Q.
        Biomechanical comparison of a single-row versus double-row suture anchor technique for rotator cuff repair.
        Am J Sports Med. 2006; 34: 407-414
        • Ma C.B.
        • Comerford L.
        • Wilson J.
        • Puttlitz C.M.
        Biomechanical evaluation of arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs: double-row compared with single-row fixation.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006; 88: 403-410
        • Greenhagen R.M.
        • Highlander P.D.
        • Burns P.R.
        Double row anchor fixation: a novel technique for a diabetic calcaneal insufficiency avulsion fracture.
        J Foot Ankle Surg. 2012; 51: 123-127
        • Kolodziej P.
        • Glisson R.R.
        • Nunley J.A.
        Risk of avulsion of the Achilles tendon after partial excision for treatment of insertional tendonitis and Haglund’s deformity: a biomechanical study.
        Foot Ankle Int. 1999; 20: 433-437
        • Gerber C.
        • Schneeberger A.G.
        • Beck M.
        • Schlegel U.
        Mechanical strength of repairs of the rotator cuff.
        J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1994; 76: 371-380
        • Cummins C.A.
        • Murrell G.A.
        Mode of failure for rotator cuff repair with suture anchors identified at revision surgery.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2003; 12: 128-133
        • Nelson C.O.
        • Sileo M.J.
        • Grossman M.G.
        • Serra-Hsu F.
        Single-row modified Mason-Allen versus double-row arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a biomechanical and surface area comparison.
        Arthroscopy. 2008; 24 (941–918)
        • Tuoheti Y.
        • Itoi E.
        • Yamamoto N.
        • Seki N.
        • Abe H.
        • Minagawa H.
        • Okada K.
        • Shimada Y.
        Contact area, contact pressure, and pressure patterns of the tendon-bone interface after rotator cuff repair.
        Am J Sports Med. 2005; 33: 1869-1874