Advertisement
Original Research| Volume 51, ISSUE 6, P753-756, November 2012

An Anatomic Safe Zone for Posterior Ankle Arthroscopy: A Cadaver Study

Published:September 24, 2012DOI:https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2012.08.007

      Abstract

      Posterior ankle arthroscopy has traditionally been associated with concern for injury to the posterior tibial nerve and vessels, and this concern is greatest when the patient is positioned supine. Positioning the patient prone could be a safer method for posterior ankle arthroscopy. The purpose of this cadaver study was to determine the anatomic safe zone devoid of vital structures relative to the posteromedial and posterolateral arthroscopic portals created. In addition, exposure of the posterior ankle was evaluated by direct visualization and fluoroscopy to determine the relative utility of these portals. Based on our findings, which are consistent with other previously reported results, we believe that a wide range of ankle pathology can be suited to treatment by means of posterior arthroscopy with the patient in the prone position.

      Level of Clinical Evidence

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Ferkel R.D.
        • Fischer S.P.
        Progress in ankle arthroscopy.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989; 240: 210-220
        • Sitler D.F.
        • Amendola A.
        • Bailey C.S.
        • Thain L.M.F.
        • Spouge A.
        Posterior ankle arthroscopy: an anatomic study.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002; 84: 763-769
        • Tryfondidis M.
        • Whitfield C.G.
        • Charalambous C.P.
        • Baraza W.K.
        • Zubairy A.I.
        • Blundel C.M.
        Posterior ankle arthroscopy portal safety regarding proximity to the tibial and sural nerves.
        Acta Orthop Belg. 2008; 74: 370-373
        • van Dijk C.N.
        • Scholten P.E.
        • Krips R.
        A 2-portal endoscopic approach for diagnosis and treatment of posterior ankle pathology.
        Arthroscopy. 2000; 16: 871-876
        • Abramowitz Y.
        • Wollstein R.
        • Barzilav Y.
        Outcomes of resection of a symptomatic os trigonum.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003; 85: 1051-1057
        • Cutsuries A.M.
        • Saltrick K.R.
        • Catanzariti A.R.
        Arthroscopic arthroplasty of the ankle joint.
        Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 1994; 11: 449-467
        • Scranton Jr., P.E.
        • McDurmott J.E.
        Anterior tibiotalar spurs: a comparison of open versus arthroscopic debridement.
        Foot Ankle. 1992; 13: 125-129
        • Marumoto J.M.
        • Ferkel R.D.
        Arthroscopic excision of the os trigonum: a new technique with preliminary results.
        Foot Ankle Int. 1997; 18: 777-784
        • Willits K.
        • et al.
        Outcome of posterior ankle arthroscopy for hindfoot impingement.
        Arthroscopy. 2008; 24: 196-202
        • van Dijk C.N.
        • van Bergen C.J.A.
        Advancements in ankle arthroscopy.
        J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2008; 16: 635-646