Advertisement

Combination of pedCAT® for 3D Imaging in Standing Position With Pedography Shows No Statistical Correlation of Bone Position With Force/Pressure Distribution

      Abstract

      pedCAT® (CurveBeam, Warrington, PA) is a technology for 3-dimensional (3D) imaging with full weightbearing that has been proved to exactly visualize the 3D bone position. For the present study, a customized pedography sensor (Pliance; Novel, Munich, Germany) was inserted into the pedCAT®. The aim of our study was to analyze the correlation of the bone position and force/pressure distribution. A prospective consecutive study of 50 patients was performed, starting July 28, 2014. All patients underwent a pedCAT® scan and simultaneous pedography with full weightbearing in the standing position. The following parameters were measured on the pedCAT® image for the right foot by 3 different investigators 3 times: lateral talo-first metatarsal angle, calcaneal pitch angle, and minimum height of the fifth metatarsal base, second to fifth metatarsal heads, and medial sesamoid. From the pedography data, the following parameters were defined using the standardized software algorithm: midfoot contact area, maximum force of midfoot, maximum force of midfoot lateral, maximum force of entire foot, and maximum pressure of first to fifth metatarsal. The values of the corresponding pedCAT® and pedographic parameters were correlated (Pearson). The intra- and interobserver reliability of the pedCAT® measurements were sufficient (analysis of variance, p > .8 for each, power >0.8). No sufficient correlation was found between the pedCAT® and pedographic parameters (r < 0.05 or r > −0.38).3D bone position did not correlate with the force and pressure distribution under the foot sole during simultaneous pedCAT® scanning and pedography. Thus, the bone positions measured with pedCAT® do not allow conclusions about the force and pressure distribution. However, the static pedographic parameters also do not allow conclusions about the 3D bone position.one position and force/pressure distribution are important parameters for diagnostics, planning, and follow-up examinations in foot and ankle surgery.

      Level of Clinical Evidence

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Easley M.E.
        • Trnka H.J.
        • Schon L.C.
        • Myerson M.S.
        Isolated subtalar arthrodesis.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000; 82: 613-624
        • Marti R.K.
        • de Heus J.A.
        • Roolker W.
        • Poolman R.W.
        • Besselaar P.P.
        Subtalar arthrodesis with correction of deformity after fractures of the os calcis.
        J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999; 81: 611-616
        • Rammelt S.
        • Grass R.
        • Zawadski T.
        • Biewener A.
        • Zwipp H.
        Foot function after subtalar distraction bone-block arthrodesis: a prospective study.
        J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004; 86: 659-668
        • Richter M.
        • Seidl B.
        • Zech S.
        • Hahn S.
        pedCAT for 3D-imaging in standing position allows for more accurate bone position (angle) measurement than radiographs or CT.
        Foot Ankle Surg. 2014; 20: 201-207
        • Richter M.
        • Zech S.
        Leonard J. Goldner Award 2009: intraoperative pedobarography leads to improved outcome scores: a level I study.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2009; 30: 1029-1036
        • Trnka H.J.
        • Easley M.E.
        • Lam P.W.
        • Anderson C.D.
        • Schon L.C.
        • Myerson M.S.
        Subtalar distraction bone block arthrodesis.
        J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001; 83: 849-854
        • Zwipp H.
        Biomechanik der Sprunggelenke.
        Unfallchirurg. 1989; 92: 98-102
        • Zwipp H.
        Chirurgie des Fusses.
        Springer, Heidelberg, New York1994
        • Cavanagh P.R.
        • Henley J.D.
        The computer era in gait analysis.
        Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 1993; 10: 471-484
        • Cavanagh P.R.
        • Rodgers M.M.
        • Iiboshi A.
        Pressure distribution under symptom-free feet during barefoot standing.
        Foot Ankle. 1987; 7: 262-276
        • Rosenbaum D.
        • Becker H.P.
        • Sterk J.
        • Gerngross H.
        • Claes L.
        Functional evaluation of the 10-year outcome after modified Evans repair for chronic ankle instability.
        Foot Ankle Int. 1997; 18: 765-771
        • Grieve D.W.
        • Rashdi T.
        Pressures under normal feet in standing and walking as measured by foil pedobarography.
        Ann Rheum Dis. 1984; 43: 816-818
        • Inman V.T.
        • Ralston H.J.
        • Todd F.
        Human Walking.
        Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia1981
        • Alexander I.J.
        • Chao E.Y.
        • Johnson K.A.
        The assessment of dynamic foot-to-ground contact forces and plantar pressure distribution: a review of the evolution of current techniques and clinical applications.
        Foot Ankle. 1990; 11: 152-167
        • Becker H.P.
        • Rosenbaum D.
        • Zeithammer G.
        • Gerngross H.
        • Claes L.
        Gait pattern analysis after ankle ligament reconstruction (modified Evans procedure).
        Foot Ankle Int. 1994; 15: 477-482
        • Cavanagh P.R.
        • Ulbrecht J.S.
        • Caputo G.M.
        Elevated plantar pressure and ulceration in diabetic patients after panmetatarsal head resection: two case reports.
        Foot Ankle Int. 1999; 20: 521-526
        • Rosenbaum D.
        • Engelhardt M.
        • Becker H.P.
        • Claes L.
        • Gerngross H.
        Clinical and functional outcome after anatomic and nonanatomic ankle ligament reconstruction: Evans tenodesis versus periosteal flap.
        Foot Ankle Int. 1999; 20: 636-639
        • Talbot K.D.
        • Saltzman C.L.
        Assessing sesamoid subluxation: how good is the AP radiograph?.
        Foot Ankle Int. 1998; 19: 547-554
        • Yildirim Y.
        • Cabukoglu C.
        • Erol B.
        • Esemenli T.
        Effect of metatarsophalangeal joint position on the reliability of the tangential sesamoid view in determining sesamoid position.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2005; 26: 247-250
        • Richter M.
        • Zech S.
        Lengthening osteotomy of the calcaneus and flexor digitorum longus tendon transfer in flexible flatfoot deformity improves talo-1st metatarsal-index, clinical outcome and pedographic parameter.
        Foot Ankle Surg. 2012; 19: 56-61
        • Richter M.
        • Frink M.
        • Zech S.
        • Vanin N.
        • Geerling J.
        • Droste P.
        • Krettek C.
        Intraoperative pedography: a validated method for static intraoperative biomechanical assessment.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2006; 27: 833-842
        • Richter M.
        • Zech S.
        • Kalpen A.
        Pedographic findings in 461 patients in a foot and ankle outpatient clinic—definition of standard pedographic patterns for typical pathologies.
        J Foot Ankle Res. 2008; 1: O24
        • Ludlow B.W.
        • Ivanovic M.
        Weightbearing CBCT, MDCT, and 2D imaging dosimetry of the foot and ankle.
        Int J Diagn Imaging. 2014; 1: 1-9