Sagittal Ankle and Midfoot Range of Motion Before and After Revision Total Ankle Replacement: A Retrospective Comparative Analysis

References

1. • Gougoulias N.
   • Maffulli N.
   History of total ankle replacement in North America.
   in: Roukis T.S. Berlet G.C. Bibbo C. Hyer C.F. Penner M.J. Wünschel M. Primary and Revision Total Ankle Replacement: Evidence-based Surgical Management. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland2016: 3-13
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
2. • Roukis T.S.
   • Bartel A.F.
   Survivorship of first-, second- and third-generation total ankle replacement systems.
   in: Roukis T.S. Berlet G.C. Bibbo C. Hyer C.F. Penner M.J. Wünschel M. Primary and Revision Total Ankle Replacement: Evidence-based Surgical Management. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland2016: 15-23
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
3. • Barg A.
   • Wimmer M.D.
   • Wiewiorski M.
   • Wirtz D.C.
   • Pagenstert G.I.
   • Valderrabano V.
   Total ankle replacement: indications, implant designs and results.
   Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2015; 112: 177-184
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
4. • Elliott A.D.
   • Roukis T.S.
   Current indication and contraindications for primary total ankle replacement.
   in: Roukis T.S. Berlet G.C. Bibbo C. Hyer C.F. Penner M.J. Wünschel M. Primary and Revision Total Ankle Replacement: Evidence-Based Surgical Management. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland2016: 53-64
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
5. • Bartel A.F.
   • Roukis T.S.
   Total ankle replacement survival rates based on Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of national joint registry data.
   Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2015; 32: 483-494
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
6. • Hintermann B.
   • Zwicky L.
   • Knupp M.
   • Henninger H.B.
   • Barg A.
   HINTEGRA revision arthroplasty for failed total ankle prostheses.
   J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013; 95: 1166-1174
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
7. • Barg A.
   • Horisberger M.
   • Paul J.
   [Salvage procedures after failed total ankle replacement].
   Fuß Sprun. 2013; 11: 228-237
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
8. • Roukis T.S.
   • Simonson D.C.
   Incidence of complications during initial experience with revision of the Agility and Agility LP total ankle replacement systems: a single surgeon's learning curve experience.
   Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2015; 32: 569-593
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
9. • Deleu P.A.
   • Bevernage B.D.
   • Maldague P.
   • Gombault V.
   • Leemrijse T.H.
   Arthrodesis after failed total ankle replacement.
   Foot Ankle Int. 2014; 35: 549-557
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
10. • Rahm S.
    • Klammer G.
    • Benninger E.
    • Gerber F.
    • Farshad M.
    • Espinosa N.
    Inferior results of salvage arthrodesis after failed ankle replacement compared to primary arthrodesis.
    Foot Ankle Int. 2015; 36: 349-359
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
11. • Roukis T.S.
    Treatment strategies for revision total ankle replacement.
    J Orthop Trauma Rehabil. 2014; 18: 59-68
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
12. • Kimberley A.G.
    Malunited fractures affecting the ankle joint.
    Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1936; 62: 79-84
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
13. • Fuchs S.
    • Sandmann C.
    • Skwara A.
    • Chylarecki C.
    Quality of life 20 years after arthrodesis of the ankle: a study of adjacent joints.
    J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003; 85: 994-998
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
14. • Lattig C.F.
    • Kuster M.S.
    • Lampert C.
    Does foot position in tibiotalar arthrodesis have an effect on development of secondary arthrosis?.
    Foot Ankle Surg. 2003; 9: 25-29
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
15. • Coester L.
    • Saltzman C.L.
    • Leupold J.
    • Pontarelli W.
    Long-term results following ankle arthrodesis for post-traumatic arthritis.
    J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001; 83: 219
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
16. • Wu W.L.
    • Su F.C.
    • Cheng Y.M.
    • Huang P.J.
    • Chou Y.L.
    • Chou C.K.
    Gait analysis after ankle arthrodesis.
    Gait Posture. 2000; 11: 54-61
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
17. • Sheridan B.
    • Robinson D.E.
    • Hubble M.J.W.
    • Winson I.G.
    Ankle arthrodesis and its relationship to ipsilateral arthritis of the hind- and mid-foot.
    J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006; 88: 206-207
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
18. • Buchner M.
    • Sabo D.
    Ankle fusion attributable to post-traumatic arthrosis: a long-term follow-up of 48 patients.
    Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003; 406: 155-164
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
19. • Ben A.H.
    • Kallel S.
    • Karray S.
    • Saadaoui F.
    • Zouri M.
    • Litaiem T.
    • Douik M.
    [Consequences of tibiotalar arthrodesis on the foot. A retrospective study of 36 cases with 8.5 years of follow-up].
    Acta Orthop Belg. 1999; 65: 48-56
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
20. • Conti R.
    • Walter Jr, J.
    Effects of ankle arthrodesis on the subtalar and midtarsal joints.
    J Foot Surg. 1989; 29: 334-336
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
21. • Suckel A.
    • Burger A.
    • Wülker N.
    • Wünschel M.
    [Ankle arthrodesis-clinical, radiological and biomechanical aspects with special regard to the adjacent joints].
    Z Orthop Unfall. 2012; 150: 588-593
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
22. • Ling J.S.
    • Smyth N.A.
    • Fraser E.J.
    • Hogan M.V.
    • Seaworth C.M.
    • Ross K.A.
    • Kennedy J.G.
    Investigating the relationship between ankle arthrodesis and adjacent-joint arthritis in the hindfoot: a systematic review.
    J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015; 97: 513-519
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
23. • Jackson A.
    • Glasgow M.
    Tarsal hypermobility after ankle fusion: fact or fiction?.
    J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1979; 61: 470-473
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
24. • Braito M.
    • Dammerer D.
    • Kaufmann G.
    • Fischler S.
    • Carollo J.
    • Reinthaler A.
    • Huber D.
    • Biedermann R.
    Are our expectations bigger than the results we achieve? A comparative study analyzing potential advantages of total ankle replacement over arthrodesis.
    Int Orthop. 2014; 38: 1647-1653
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
25. • van der Plaat L.W.
    • van Engelen S.J.P.M.
    • Wajer Q.E.
    • Hendrickx R.P.M.
    • Doets K.H.C.
    • Houdijk H.
    • van Dijk C.N.
    Hind- and midfoot motion after ankle arthrodesis.
    Foot Ankle Int. 2015; 36: 1430-1437
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
26. • Coetzee J.C.
    • Castro M.D.
    Accurate measurement of ankle range of motion after total ankle arthroplasty.
    Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004; 424: 27-31
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
27. • Dekker T.J.
    • Hamid K.S.
    • Easley M.E.
    • DeOrio J.K.
    • Nunley J.A.
    • Adams S.B.
    Ratio of range of motion of the ankle and surrounding joints after total ankle replacement: a radiographic cohort study.
    J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017; 99: 576-582
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
28. • Sealey R.J.
    • Myerson M.S.
    • Molloy A.
    • Gamba C.
    • Jeng C.
    • Kalesan B.
    Sagittal plane motion of the hindfoot following ankle arthrodesis: a prospective analysis.
    Foot Ankle Int. 2009; 30: 187-196
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
29. • Ajis A.
    • Henriquez H.
    • Myerson M.S.
    Postoperative range of motion trends following total ankle arthroplasty.
    Foot Ankle Int. 2013; 34: 645-656
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
30. • Gaudot F.
    • Colombier J.A.
    • Bonnin M.
    • Judet T.
    A controlled, comparative study of a fixed-bearing versus mobile-bearing ankle arthroplasty.
    Foot Ankle Int. 2014; 35: 131-140
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
31. • Hsu A.R.
    • Haddad S.L.
    Early clinical and radiographic outcomes of intramedullary-fixation total ankle arthroplasty.
    J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015; 97: 194-200
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
32. • Gellman H.
    • Lenihan M.
    • Halikis N.
    • Botte M.J.
    • Giordani M.
    • Perry J.
    Selective tarsal arthrodesis: an in vitro analysis of the effect on foot motion.
    Foot Ankle. 1987; 8: 127-133
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
33. • Ouzounian T.J.
    • Shereff M.J.
    In vitro determination of midfoot motion.
    Foot Ankle. 1989; 10: 140-146
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
34. • Lundberg A.
    • Goldie I.
    • Kalin B.O.
    • Selvik G.
    Kinematics of the ankle/foot complex: plantaflexion and dorsiflexion.
    Foot Ankle. 1989; 9: 194-200
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
35. • Lundberg A.
    • Svensson O.K.
    • Bylund C.
    • Goldie I.
    • Selvik G.
    Kinematics of the ankle/foot complex—part 2: pronation and supination.
    Foot Ankle. 1989; 9: 248-253
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
36. • Roukis T.S.
    Current and future designs for total ankle replacement.
    Curr Orthop Pract. 2016; 27: 484-489
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
37. • Lundberg A.
    • Svensson O.K.
    • Bylund C.
    • Selvik G.
    Kinematics of the ankle/foot complex—part 3: influence of leg rotation.
    Foot Ankle. 1989; 9: 304-309
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar