Advertisement

Sagittal Ankle and Midfoot Range of Motion Before and After Revision Total Ankle Replacement: A Retrospective Comparative Analysis

Published:March 01, 2018DOI:https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2017.11.017

      Abstract

      The most common reason for a revision total ankle replacement procedure is a painful, stiff ankle even after the initial surgery. Limited and conflicting data are available regarding the change in sagittal foot and ankle range of motion after revision total ankle replacement surgery. We sought to determine whether revision total ankle replacements would reduce compensatory midfoot range of motion. In determining this, a novel radiographic measurement system with stable osseous landmarks is used. A retrospective medical record review of patients who had undergone revision total ankle replacement from January 2009 to June 2016 was performed. Thirty-three patients (33 ankles) underwent revision total ankle replacement surgery and met the inclusion criteria with a mean follow-up period of 28.39 ± 14.68 (range 2 to 59) months. Investigation of preoperative and postoperative weightbearing lateral radiographic images was performed to determine the global foot and ankle, isolated ankle, and isolated midfoot sagittal ranges of motion. Statistical analysis revealed a significant increase in ankle range of motion (p = .046) and a significant decrease in midfoot range of motion (p < .001) from preoperatively to postoperatively. The change in global foot and ankle range of motion was not significant (p = .53). For this patient population, the increased ankle range of motion effectively resulted in less compensatory midfoot range of motion.

      Level of Clinical Evidence

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Gougoulias N.
        • Maffulli N.
        History of total ankle replacement in North America.
        in: Roukis T.S. Berlet G.C. Bibbo C. Hyer C.F. Penner M.J. Wünschel M. Primary and Revision Total Ankle Replacement: Evidence-based Surgical Management. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland2016: 3-13
        • Roukis T.S.
        • Bartel A.F.
        Survivorship of first-, second- and third-generation total ankle replacement systems.
        in: Roukis T.S. Berlet G.C. Bibbo C. Hyer C.F. Penner M.J. Wünschel M. Primary and Revision Total Ankle Replacement: Evidence-based Surgical Management. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland2016: 15-23
        • Barg A.
        • Wimmer M.D.
        • Wiewiorski M.
        • Wirtz D.C.
        • Pagenstert G.I.
        • Valderrabano V.
        Total ankle replacement: indications, implant designs and results.
        Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2015; 112: 177-184
        • Elliott A.D.
        • Roukis T.S.
        Current indication and contraindications for primary total ankle replacement.
        in: Roukis T.S. Berlet G.C. Bibbo C. Hyer C.F. Penner M.J. Wünschel M. Primary and Revision Total Ankle Replacement: Evidence-Based Surgical Management. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland2016: 53-64
        • Bartel A.F.
        • Roukis T.S.
        Total ankle replacement survival rates based on Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of national joint registry data.
        Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2015; 32: 483-494
        • Hintermann B.
        • Zwicky L.
        • Knupp M.
        • Henninger H.B.
        • Barg A.
        HINTEGRA revision arthroplasty for failed total ankle prostheses.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013; 95: 1166-1174
        • Barg A.
        • Horisberger M.
        • Paul J.
        [Salvage procedures after failed total ankle replacement].
        Fuß Sprun. 2013; 11: 228-237
        • Roukis T.S.
        • Simonson D.C.
        Incidence of complications during initial experience with revision of the Agility and Agility LP total ankle replacement systems: a single surgeon's learning curve experience.
        Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2015; 32: 569-593
        • Deleu P.A.
        • Bevernage B.D.
        • Maldague P.
        • Gombault V.
        • Leemrijse T.H.
        Arthrodesis after failed total ankle replacement.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2014; 35: 549-557
        • Rahm S.
        • Klammer G.
        • Benninger E.
        • Gerber F.
        • Farshad M.
        • Espinosa N.
        Inferior results of salvage arthrodesis after failed ankle replacement compared to primary arthrodesis.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2015; 36: 349-359
        • Roukis T.S.
        Treatment strategies for revision total ankle replacement.
        J Orthop Trauma Rehabil. 2014; 18: 59-68
        • Kimberley A.G.
        Malunited fractures affecting the ankle joint.
        Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1936; 62: 79-84
        • Fuchs S.
        • Sandmann C.
        • Skwara A.
        • Chylarecki C.
        Quality of life 20 years after arthrodesis of the ankle: a study of adjacent joints.
        J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003; 85: 994-998
        • Lattig C.F.
        • Kuster M.S.
        • Lampert C.
        Does foot position in tibiotalar arthrodesis have an effect on development of secondary arthrosis?.
        Foot Ankle Surg. 2003; 9: 25-29
        • Coester L.
        • Saltzman C.L.
        • Leupold J.
        • Pontarelli W.
        Long-term results following ankle arthrodesis for post-traumatic arthritis.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001; 83: 219
        • Wu W.L.
        • Su F.C.
        • Cheng Y.M.
        • Huang P.J.
        • Chou Y.L.
        • Chou C.K.
        Gait analysis after ankle arthrodesis.
        Gait Posture. 2000; 11: 54-61
        • Sheridan B.
        • Robinson D.E.
        • Hubble M.J.W.
        • Winson I.G.
        Ankle arthrodesis and its relationship to ipsilateral arthritis of the hind- and mid-foot.
        J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006; 88: 206-207
        • Buchner M.
        • Sabo D.
        Ankle fusion attributable to post-traumatic arthrosis: a long-term follow-up of 48 patients.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003; 406: 155-164
        • Ben A.H.
        • Kallel S.
        • Karray S.
        • Saadaoui F.
        • Zouri M.
        • Litaiem T.
        • Douik M.
        [Consequences of tibiotalar arthrodesis on the foot. A retrospective study of 36 cases with 8.5 years of follow-up].
        Acta Orthop Belg. 1999; 65: 48-56
        • Conti R.
        • Walter Jr, J.
        Effects of ankle arthrodesis on the subtalar and midtarsal joints.
        J Foot Surg. 1989; 29: 334-336
        • Suckel A.
        • Burger A.
        • Wülker N.
        • Wünschel M.
        [Ankle arthrodesis-clinical, radiological and biomechanical aspects with special regard to the adjacent joints].
        Z Orthop Unfall. 2012; 150: 588-593
        • Ling J.S.
        • Smyth N.A.
        • Fraser E.J.
        • Hogan M.V.
        • Seaworth C.M.
        • Ross K.A.
        • Kennedy J.G.
        Investigating the relationship between ankle arthrodesis and adjacent-joint arthritis in the hindfoot: a systematic review.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015; 97: 513-519
        • Jackson A.
        • Glasgow M.
        Tarsal hypermobility after ankle fusion: fact or fiction?.
        J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1979; 61: 470-473
        • Braito M.
        • Dammerer D.
        • Kaufmann G.
        • Fischler S.
        • Carollo J.
        • Reinthaler A.
        • Huber D.
        • Biedermann R.
        Are our expectations bigger than the results we achieve? A comparative study analyzing potential advantages of total ankle replacement over arthrodesis.
        Int Orthop. 2014; 38: 1647-1653
        • van der Plaat L.W.
        • van Engelen S.J.P.M.
        • Wajer Q.E.
        • Hendrickx R.P.M.
        • Doets K.H.C.
        • Houdijk H.
        • van Dijk C.N.
        Hind- and midfoot motion after ankle arthrodesis.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2015; 36: 1430-1437
        • Coetzee J.C.
        • Castro M.D.
        Accurate measurement of ankle range of motion after total ankle arthroplasty.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004; 424: 27-31
        • Dekker T.J.
        • Hamid K.S.
        • Easley M.E.
        • DeOrio J.K.
        • Nunley J.A.
        • Adams S.B.
        Ratio of range of motion of the ankle and surrounding joints after total ankle replacement: a radiographic cohort study.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017; 99: 576-582
        • Sealey R.J.
        • Myerson M.S.
        • Molloy A.
        • Gamba C.
        • Jeng C.
        • Kalesan B.
        Sagittal plane motion of the hindfoot following ankle arthrodesis: a prospective analysis.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2009; 30: 187-196
        • Ajis A.
        • Henriquez H.
        • Myerson M.S.
        Postoperative range of motion trends following total ankle arthroplasty.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2013; 34: 645-656
        • Gaudot F.
        • Colombier J.A.
        • Bonnin M.
        • Judet T.
        A controlled, comparative study of a fixed-bearing versus mobile-bearing ankle arthroplasty.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2014; 35: 131-140
        • Hsu A.R.
        • Haddad S.L.
        Early clinical and radiographic outcomes of intramedullary-fixation total ankle arthroplasty.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015; 97: 194-200
        • Gellman H.
        • Lenihan M.
        • Halikis N.
        • Botte M.J.
        • Giordani M.
        • Perry J.
        Selective tarsal arthrodesis: an in vitro analysis of the effect on foot motion.
        Foot Ankle. 1987; 8: 127-133
        • Ouzounian T.J.
        • Shereff M.J.
        In vitro determination of midfoot motion.
        Foot Ankle. 1989; 10: 140-146
        • Lundberg A.
        • Goldie I.
        • Kalin B.O.
        • Selvik G.
        Kinematics of the ankle/foot complex: plantaflexion and dorsiflexion.
        Foot Ankle. 1989; 9: 194-200
        • Lundberg A.
        • Svensson O.K.
        • Bylund C.
        • Goldie I.
        • Selvik G.
        Kinematics of the ankle/foot complex—part 2: pronation and supination.
        Foot Ankle. 1989; 9: 248-253
        • Roukis T.S.
        Current and future designs for total ankle replacement.
        Curr Orthop Pract. 2016; 27: 484-489
        • Lundberg A.
        • Svensson O.K.
        • Bylund C.
        • Selvik G.
        Kinematics of the ankle/foot complex—part 3: influence of leg rotation.
        Foot Ankle. 1989; 9: 304-309