Advertisement
Review Articles| Volume 58, ISSUE 4, P748-754, July 2019

Download started.

Ok

Multisegment Foot Models and Clinical Application After Foot and Ankle Trauma: A Review

  • Sander van Hoeve
    Correspondence
    Address correspondence to: Sander van Hoeve, MSc, Division of Trauma Surgery, Division of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, P. Debyelaan 25, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
    Affiliations
    Professor, Division of Trauma Surgery, Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
    Search for articles by this author
  • Martijn Poeze
    Affiliations
    Professor, Division of Trauma Surgery, Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands

    Professor, School for Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, NUTRIM, Maastricht, The Netherlands
    Search for articles by this author
Published:April 20, 2019DOI:https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2018.11.013

      ABSTRACT

      Since the end of the 1990s, several multisegment foot models (MSFMs) have been developed. Several models were used to describe foot and ankle kinematics in patients with foot and ankle pathologies; however, the diagnostic value for clinical practice of these models is not known. This review searched in the literature for studies describing kinematics in patients after foot and ankle trauma using an MSFM. The diagnostic value of the MSFMs in patients after foot and ankle trauma was also investigated. A search was performed on the databases PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library. To investigate the diagnostic value of MSFMs in patients after foot and ankle trauma, studies were classified and analyzed following the diagnostic research questions formulated by Knottnerus and Buntinx. This review was based on 7 articles. All studies were published between 2010 and 2015. Five studies were retrospective studies, and 2 used an intervention. Three studies described foot and ankle kinematics in patients after fractures. Four studies described foot and ankle kinematics in patients after ankle sprain. In all included studies, altered foot and ankle kinematics were found compared with healthy subjects. No results on patient outcome using MSFMs and costs were found. Seven studies were found reporting foot and ankle kinematics in patients after foot and ankle trauma using an MSFM. Results show altered kinematics compared with healthy subjects, which cannot be seen by other diagnostic tests and add valuable data to the present literature; therefore, MSFMs seem to be promising diagnostic tools for evaluating foot and ankle kinematics. More research is needed to find the additional value for MSFMs regarding patient outcome and costs.

      Level of Clinical Evidence

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Deschamps K
        • Staes F
        • Roosen P
        • Nobels F
        • Desloovere K
        • Bruyninckx H
        • Matricali GA
        Body of evidence supporting the clinical use of 3D multisegment foot models: a systematic review.
        Gait Posture. 2011; 33: 338-349
        • Arampatzis A
        • Bruggemann GP
        • Klapsing GM
        A three-dimensional shank-foot model to determine the foot motion during landings.
        Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002; 34: 130-138
        • Bishop C
        • Paul G
        • Thewlis D
        The reliability, accuracy and minimal detectable difference of a multi-segment kinematic model of the foot-shoe complex.
        Gait Posture. 2013; 37: 552-557
        • Bruening DA
        • Cooney KM
        • Buczek FL
        Analysis of a kinetic multi-segment foot model part II: kinetics and clinical implications.
        Gait Posture. 2012; 35: 535-540
        • Caravaggi P
        • Benedetti MG
        • Berti L
        • Leardini A
        Repeatability of a multi-segment foot protocol in adult subjects.
        Gait Posture. 2011; 33: 133-135
        • Carson MC
        • Harrington ME
        • Thompson N
        • O'Conner JJ
        • Theologis TN
        Kinematic analysis of a multi-segment foot model for research and clinical applications: a repeatability analysis.
        J Biomech. 2001; 34: 1299-1307
        • Cobb SC
        • Tiss LL
        • Johnson JT
        • Wang YT
        • Geil MD
        • McCarty FA
        The effect of low mobile foot posture on multi-segment medial foot model gait kinematics.
        Gait Posture. 2009; 30: 334-339
        • Cornwall MW
        • McPoil TG
        Three dimensional movement of the foot during the stance phase of walking.
        J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 1999; 89: 56-66
        • Cornwall MW
        • McPoil TG
        Motion of the calcaneus, navicular and first metatarsal during the stance phase of walking.
        J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2002; 92: 67-76
        • Curtis DJ
        • Bencke J
        • Stebbins JA
        • Stansfield B
        Intra-rater repeatability of the Oxford foot model in healthy children in different stages of the foot roll over process during gait.
        Gait Posture. 2009; 30: 118-121
        • De Mits
        • Segers V
        • Woodburn J
        • Elewaut D
        • De Clercq D
        • Roosen P
        A clinically applicable six-segmented foot model.
        J Orthop Res. 2012; 30: 655-661
        • Deschamps K
        • Staes F
        • Bruyninckx H
        • Busschots E
        • Jaspers E
        • Atre A
        • Desloovere K
        Repeatability in the assessment of multi-segment foot kinematics.
        Gait Posture. 2012; 35: 255-260
        • Houck JR
        • Tome JM
        • Nawoczenski DA
        Subtalar neutral position as an offset for a kinematic model of the foot during walking.
        Gait Posture. 2008; 28: 29-37
        • Hunt AE
        • Smith RM
        • Torode M
        • Keenan AM
        Inter-segment foot motion and ground reaction forces over the stance phase of walking.
        Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2001; 16: 592-600
        • Jenkyn TR
        • Anas K
        • Nichol A
        Foot segment kinematics during normal walking using a multisegment model of the foot and ankle complex.
        J Biomech Eng. 2009; 131034604
        • Jenkyn TR
        • Nichol A
        A multi-segment kinematic model of the foot with a novel definition of forefoot motion for use in clinical gait analysis during walking.
        J Biomech. 2007; 40: 3271-3278
        • Kidder SM
        • Abuzzahab FS
        • Harris GF
        • Johnson JE
        A system for the analysis of foot and ankle kinematics during gait.
        IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng. 1996; 4: 25-32
        • Leardini A
        • BM
        • Catani F
        • Simoncini L
        • Giannini S
        An anatomically based protocol for the description of foot segment kinematics during gait.
        Clin Biomech. 1999; 14: 528-536
        • Leardini A
        • Benedetti MG
        • Berti L
        • Bettinelli D
        • Nativo R
        • Giannini S
        Rear-foot, mid-foot and fore-foot motion during the stance phase of gait.
        Gait Posture. 2007; 25: 453-462
        • Long JT
        • Eastwood DC
        • Graf AR
        • Smith AP
        • Harris GF
        Repeatability and sources of variability in multi-center assessment of segmental foot kinematics in normal adults.
        Gait Posture. 2009; 31: 32-36
        • MacWilliams BA
        • Cowley M
        • Nicholson DE
        Foot kinematics and kinetics during adolescent gait.
        Gait Posture. 2003; 17: 214-224
        • Myers KA
        • Wang M
        • Marks RM
        • Harris GF
        Validation of a multisegment foot and ankle kinematic model for pediatric gait.
        IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng. 2004; 12: 122-130
        • Pohl MB
        • Messenger N
        • Buckley JG
        Changes in foot and lower limb coupling due to systematic variations in step width.
        Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2006; 21: 175-183
        • Rattanaprasert U
        • Smith R
        • Sullivan M
        • Gilleard W
        Three-dimensional kinematics of the forefoot, rearfoot, and leg without the function of tibialis posterior in comparison with normal during stance phase of walking.
        Clin Biomech. 1999; 14: 14-23
        • Seo SG
        • Lee DY
        • Moon HJ
        • Kim SJ
        • Kim J
        • Lee KM
        • Chung CY
        • Choi IH
        Repeatability of a multi-segment foot model with a 15-marker set in healthy adults.
        J Foot Ankle Res. 2014; : 24
        • Simon J
        • Doederlein L
        • McCintosh AS
        • Mataxiotis D
        • Block HG
        • Wolf SI
        The Heidelberg foot measurement method: development, description and assessment.
        Gait Posture. 2006; 23: 411-424
        • Stebbins J
        • Harrington M
        • Thompson N
        • Zavatsky A
        • Theologis T
        Repeatability of a model for measuring multi-segment foot kinematics in children.
        Gait Posture. 2006; 23: 401-410
        • Tome J
        • Nawoczenski DA
        • Flemister A
        • Houck J
        Comparison of foot kinematics between subjects with posterior tibialis tendon dysfunction and healthy controls.
        J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006; 36: 635-644
      1. Wilken JS, Yack C. Validation of a multi-segment foot model. In: Paper presented at the summer meeting of the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society; Seattle, WA; July 29-31, 2004.

        • Wright CJ
        • Arnold BL
        • Coffey TG
        • Pidcoe PE
        Repeatability of the modified Oxford foot model during gait in healthy adults.
        Gait Posture. 2011; 33: 108-112
        • Wu WL
        • Su FC
        • Cheng YM
        • Huang PJ
        • Chou YL
        • Chou CK
        Gait analysis after ankle arthrodesis.
        Gait Posture. 2000; 11: 54-61
        • Hwang SJ
        • Choi HS
        • Kim YH
        Motion analysis based on a multi-segment foot model in normal walking.
        Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2004; 7: 5104-5106
        • Saraswat P
        • MacWilliams BA
        • Davis RB
        A multi-segment foot model based on anatomically registered technical coordinate systems: method repeatability in pediatric feet.
        Gait Posture. 2012; 35: 547-555
        • Oosterwaal M
        • Carbes S
        • Telfer S
        • Woodburn J
        • Torholm S
        • Al-Munajjed A
        • van Rijn L
        • Meijer K
        The Glasgow-Maastricht foot model, evaluation of a 26 segment kinematic model of the foot.
        J Foot Ankle Res. 2016; 9: 19
        • Hunt AE
        • Smith RM
        • Torode M
        Extrinsic muscle activity, foot motion and ankle joint moments during the stance phase of walking.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2001; 22: 31-41
        • Kitaoka HB
        • Crevoisier XM
        • Hansen D
        • Katajarvi B
        • Harbst K
        • Kaufman KR
        Foot and ankle kinematics and ground reaction forces during ambulation.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2006; 27: 808-813
        • Dicharry JM
        • Franz JR
        • Della Croce U
        • Wilder RP
        • Riley PO
        • Kerrigan DC
        Differences in static and dynamic measures in evaluation of talonavicular mobility in gait.
        J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2009; 39: 628-634
        • Tulchin K
        • Orendurff M
        • Karol L
        A comparison of multi-segment foot kinematics during level overground and treadmill walking.
        Gait Posture. 2010; 31: 104-108
        • Bishop C
        • Paul G
        • Thewlis D
        The reliability: accuracy and minimal detectable difference of a multi-segment kinematic model of the foot-shoe complex.
        Gait Posture. 2013; 37: 552-557
        • van Hoeve S
        • de Vos J
        • Weijers P
        • Verbruggen J
        • Willems P
        • Poeze M
        • Meijer K
        Repeatability of the Oxford foot model for kinematic gait analysis of the foot and ankle.
        Clin Res Foot Ankle. 2015; 3: 171
        • Nester CJ
        • Jarvis HL
        • Jones RK
        • Bowden PD
        • Liu A
        Movement of the human foot in 100 pain free individuals aged 18-45: implications for understanding normal foot function.
        J Foot Ankle Res. 2014; 28: 51
        • Kadaba MP
        • Ramakrishnan HK
        • Wootten ME
        • Gainey J
        • Gorton G
        • Cochran GV
        Repeatability of kinematic, kinetic, and electromyographic data in normal adult gait.
        J Orthop Res. 1989; 7: 849-860
        • McGinley JL
        • Baker R
        • Wolfe R
        • Morris ME
        The reliability of three-dimensional kinematic gait measurements: a systematic review.
        Gait Posture. 2009; 29: 360-369
        • Arnold JB
        • Mackintosh S
        • Jones S
        • Thewlis D
        Repeatability of stance phase kinematics from a multi-segment foot model in people aged 50 years and older.
        Gait Posture. 2013; 38: 349-351
        • Arnold JB
        • Mackintosh S
        • Jones S
        • Thewlis D
        Differences in foot kinematics between young and older adults during walking.
        Gait Posture. 2014; 39: 689-694
        • Dubbeldam R
        • Buurke JH
        • Simons C
        • Groothuis-Oudshoorn CG
        • Baan H
        • Nene AV
        • Hermens HJ
        The effects of walking speed on forefoot, hindfoot and ankle joint motion.
        Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2010; 25: 796-801
        • Tulchin K
        • Orendurff M
        • Adolfsen S
        • Karol L
        The effects of walking speed on multisegment foot kinematics in adults.
        J Appl Biomech. 2009; 25: 377-386
        • Tulchin K
        • Orendurff M
        • Karol L
        The effects of surface slope on multi-segment foot kinematics in healthy adults.
        Gait Posture. 2010; 32: 446-450
        • Chard A
        • Greene A
        • Hunt A
        • Vanwanseele B
        • Smith R
        Effect of thong style flip-flops on children's barefoot walking and jogging kinematics.
        J Foot Ankle Res. 2013; 5: 8
        • Powell DW
        • Long B
        • Milner CE
        • Zhang S
        Frontal plane multi-segment foot kinematics in high- and low-arched females during dynamic loading tasks.
        Hum Mov Sci. 2011; 30: 105-114
        • Morey-Klapsing G
        • Arampatzis A
        • Brueggeman GP
        Joint stabilizing response to expected and unexpected tilts.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2005; 26: 870-880
        • Morey-Klapsing G
        • Arampatzis A
        • Brueggeman GP
        Joint stabilising response to lateral and medial tilts.
        Clin Biomech. 2006; 20: 517-525
        • Morey-Klapsing G
        • Arampatzis A
        • Brueggeman GP
        Evidence of proactive forefoot control during landings on inclined surfaces.
        J Mot Behav. 2007; 39: 89-102
        • Jenkyn TR
        • Shultz R
        • Giffin JR
        • Birmingham TB
        A comparison of subtalar joint motion during anticipated medial cutting turns and level walking using a multi-segment foot model.
        Gait Posture. 2010; 31: 153-158
        • Shultz R
        • Birmingham TB
        • Jenkyn TR
        Differences in neutral foot positions when measured barefoot compared to in shoes with varying stiffnesses.
        Med Eng Phys. 2011; 33: 1309-1313
        • Legault-Moore D
        • Chester VL
        • de Vries G
        Multisegment foot kinematics during walking in younger and older adults.
        J Clin Med Res. 2012; 4: 259-266
        • Forghany S
        • Nester CJ
        • Tyson SF
        • Preece S
        • Jones RK
        The effect of stroke on foot kinematics and the functional consequences.
        Gait Posture. 2014; 39: 1051-1056
        • Sawacha Z
        • Cristoferi G
        • Guarneri G
        • Corazza S
        • Donà G
        • Denti P
        • Facchinetti A
        • Avogaro A
        • Cobelli C
        Characterizing multisegment foot kinematics during gait in diabetic foot patients.
        J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2009; 23: 37
        • Barn R
        • Rafferty D
        • Turner DE
        • Woodburn J
        Reliability study of tibialis posterior and selected leg muscle EMG and multi-segment foot kinematics in rheumatoid arthritis associated pes planovalgus.
        Gait Posture. 2012; 36: 567-571
        • Hyslop E
        • Woodburn J
        • McInnes IB
        • Semple R
        • Newcombe L
        • Hendry G
        • Rafferty D
        • De Mits S
        • Turner DE
        A reliability study of biomechanical foot function in psoriatic arthritis based on a novel multi-segmented foot model.
        Gait Posture. 2010; 32: 619-626
        • Alonso-Vázquez A
        • Villarroya MA
        • Franco MA
        • Asín J
        • Calvo B
        Kinematic assessment of paediatric forefoot varus.
        Gait Posture. 2009; 29: 214-219
        • Atkinson HD
        • Daniels TR
        • Klejman S
        • Pinsker E
        • Houck JR
        • Singer S
        Pre- and postoperative gait analysis following conversion of tibiotalocalcaneal fusion to total ankle arthroplasty.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2010; 31: 927-932
        • Barton CJ
        • Levinger P
        • Webster KE
        • Menz HB
        Walking kinematics in individuals with patellofemoral pain syndrome: a case-control study.
        Gait Posture. 2011; 33: 286-291
        • Barton CJ
        • Levinger P
        • Crossley KM
        • Webster KE
        • Menz HB
        Relationships between the Foot Posture Index and foot kinematics during gait in individuals with and without patellofemoral pain syndrome.
        J Foot Ankle Res. 2011; 14: 10
        • Barton CJ
        • Menz HB
        • Levinger P
        • Webster KE
        • Crossley KM
        Greater peak rearfoot eversion predicts foot orthoses efficacy in individuals with patellofemoral pain syndrome.
        Br J Sports Med. 2011; 45: 697-701
        • Brodsky JW
        • Charlick DA
        • Coleman SC
        • Pollo FE
        • Royer CT
        Hindfoot motion following reconstruction for posterior tibial tendon dysfunction.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2009; 30: 613-618
        • Canseco K
        • Long J
        • Marks R
        • Khazzam M
        • Harris G
        Quantitative characterization of gait kinematics in patients with hallux rigidus using the Milwaukee foot model.
        J Orthop Res. 2008; 26: 419-427
        • Canseco K
        • Long J
        • Marks R
        • Khazzam M
        • Harris G
        Quantitative motion analysis in patients with hallux rigidus before and after cheilectomy.
        J Orthop Res. 2009; 27: 128-134
        • Chinn L
        • Dicharry J
        • Hart JM
        • Saliba S
        • Wilder R
        • Hertel J
        Gait kinematics after taping in participants with chronic ankle instability.
        J Athl Train. 2014; 49: 322-330
        • De Ridder R
        • Willems T
        • Vanrenterghem J
        • Robinson M
        • Pataky T
        • Roosen P
        Gait kinematics of subjects with ankle instability using a multisegmented foot model.
        Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2013; 45 (2169–2136)
        • De Ridder R
        • Willems T
        • Vanrenterghem J
        • Robinson MA
        • Palmans T
        • Roosen P
        Multi-segment foot landing kinematics in subjects with chronic ankle instability.
        Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2015; 30: 585-592
        • Deschamps K
        • Birch I
        • Desloovere K
        • Matricali GA
        The impact of hallux valgus on foot kinematics: a cross-sectional, comparative study.
        Gait Posture. 2010; 32: 102-106
        • Ferber R
        • Benson B
        Changes in multi-segment foot biomechanics with a heat-mouldable semi-custom foot orthotic device.
        J Foot Ankle Res. 2011; 4: 18
        • Graf A
        • Hassani S
        • Krzak J
        • Long J
        • Caudill A
        • Flanagan A
        • Eastwood D
        • Kuo KN
        • Harris G
        • Smith P
        Long-term outcome evaluation in young adults following clubfoot surgical release.
        J Pediatr Orthop. 2010; 30: 379-385
        • Hetsroni I
        • Nyska M
        • Ben-Sira D
        • Arnson Y
        • Buksbaum C
        • Aliev E
        • Mann G
        • Massarwe S
        • Rozenfeld G
        • Ayalon M
        Analysis of foot and ankle kinematics after operative reduction of high-grade intra-articular fractures of the calcaneus.
        J Trauma. 2011; 70: 1234-1240
        • Houck J
        • Neville C
        • Tome J
        • Flemister A
        Foot kinematics during a bilateral heel rise test in participants with stage 2 posterior tibial tendon dysfunction.
        J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2009; 39: 593-603
        • Houdijk H
        • Doets HC
        • van Middelkoop M
        • Dirkjan Veeger HE
        Joint stiffness of the ankle during walking after successful mobile-bearing total ankle replacement.
        Gait Posture. 2008; 27: 115-119
        • Hunt AE
        • Smith RM
        Mechanics and control of the flat versus normal foot during the stance phase of walking.
        Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2004; 19: 391-397
        • Khazzam M
        • Long JT
        • Marks RM
        • Harris GF
        Preoperative gait characterization of patients with ankle arthrosis.
        Gait Posture. 2006; 24: 85-93
        • Khazzam M
        • Long JT
        • Marks RM
        • Harris GF
        Kinematic changes of the foot and ankle in patients with systematic rheumatoid arthritis and forefoot deformity.
        J Orthop Res. 2007; 25: 319-329
        • Krzak JJ
        • Corcos DM
        • Damiano DL
        • Graf A
        • Hedeker D
        • Smith PA
        • Harris GF
        Kinematic foot types in youth with equinovarus secondary to hemiplegia.
        Gait Posture. 2015; 41: 402-408
        • Leardini A
        • Aquila A
        • Caravaggi P
        • Ferraresi C
        • Giannini S
        Multi-segment foot mobility in a hinged ankle-foot orthosis: the effect of rotation axis position.
        Gait Posture. 2014; 40: 274-277
        • Marks RM
        • Long JT
        • Ness ME
        • Khazzam M
        • Harris GF
        Surgical reconstruction of posterior tibial tendon dysfunction; prospective comparison of flexor digitorum longus substitution combined with lateral column lengthening or medial displacement calcaneal osteotomy.
        Gait Posture. 2009; 29: 17-22
        • Ness ME
        • Long J
        • Marks R
        • Harris G
        Foot and ankle kinematics in patients with posterior tibial tendon dysfunction.
        Gait Posture. 2008; 27: 331-339
        • Portinaro N
        • Leardini A
        • Panou A
        • Monzani V
        • Caravaggi P
        Modifying the Rizzoli foot model to improve the diagnosis of pes-planus: application to kinematics of feet in teenagers.
        J Foot Ankle Res. 2014; 7: 754
        • Rabbito M
        • Pohl MB
        • Humble N
        • Ferber R
        Biomechanical and clinical factors related to stage I posterior tibial tendon dysfunction.
        J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2011; 41: 776-784
        • Rao S
        • Baumhauer JF
        • Tome J
        • Nawoczenski DA
        Comparison of in vivo segmental foot motion during walking and step decent in patients with midfoot arthritis and matched asymptomatic control subjects.
        J Biomech. 2009; 42: 1054-1060
        • Ringleb SI
        • Kavros SJ
        • Kotajarvi BR
        • Hansen DK
        • Kitaoka HB
        • Kaufman KR
        Changes in gait associated with acute stage II posterior tibial tendon dysfunction.
        Gait Posture. 2007; 25: 655-664
        • Stebbins J
        • Harrington M
        • Thompson N
        • Zavatsky A
        • Theologis T
        Gait compensations caused by foot deformity in cerebral palsy.
        Gait Posture. 2010; 32: 226-230
        • Theologis TN
        • Harrington M
        • Thompson N
        • Benson MKD
        Dynamic foot movement in children treated for congenital talipes equinovarus.
        Bone Joint J. 2003; 85: 572-577
        • Turner DE
        • Helliwell PS
        • Emery P
        • Woodburn J
        The impact of rheumatoid arthritis on foot function in the early stages of disease: a clinical case series.
        BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2006; 7: 102
        • Turner DE
        • Woodbrun J
        Characterising the clinical and biomechanical features of severely deformed feet in rheumatoid arthritis.
        Gait Posture. 2008; 28: 574-580
        • van Hoeve S
        • de Vos J
        • Verbruggen JPAM
        • Willems P
        • Meijer K
        • Poeze M
        Gait analysis and functional outcome after calcaneal fracture.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015; 97: 1879-1888
        • Wang R
        • Thur CK
        • Gutierrez-Farewik EM
        • Wretenberg P
        • Broström E
        One year follow-up after operative ankle fractures: a prospective gait analysis study with a multi-segment foot model.
        Gait Posture. 2010; 31: 234-240
        • Woodburn J
        • Nelson KM
        • Siegel KL
        • Kepple TM
        • Gerber LH
        Multisegment foot motion during gait: proof of concept in rheumatoid arthritis.
        J Rheumatol. 2004; 31: 1918-1927
        • Rao S
        • Saltzmann CL
        • Yack HJ
        Relationships between segmental foot mobility and plantar loading in individuals with and without diabetes and neuropathy.
        Gait Posture. 2010; 31: 251-255
        • Hetsroni I
        • Nyska M
        • Mann G
        • Rozenfeld G
        • Ayalon M
        Subtalar kinematics following resection of tarsal coalition.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2008; 29: 1088-1094
        • Wegener C
        • Wegener K
        • Smith R
        • Schott KH
        • Burns J
        Biomechanical effects of sensorimotor orthoses in adults with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease.
        Prosthet Orthot Int. 2016; 40: 436-446
        • Levinger P
        • Murley GS
        • Barton CJ
        • Cotchett MP
        • McSweeney SR
        • Menz HB
        A comparison of foot kinematics in people with normal- and flat-arched feet using the Oxford foot model.
        Gait Posture. 2010; 32: 519-523
        • Hösl M
        • Bohm H
        • Multerer C
        • Döderlein L
        Does excessive flatfoot deformity affect function? A comparison between symptomatic and asymptomatic flatfeet using the Oxford foot model.
        Gait Posture. 2014; 39: 23-28
        • Saraswat P
        • MacWilliams BA
        • Davis RB
        • D'Astous JL
        A multi-segment foot model based on anatomically registered technical coordinate systems: method repeatability and sensitivity in pediatric planovalgus feet.
        Gait Posture. 2013; 37: 121-125
        • Deschamps K
        • Steas F
        • Bruyninckx H
        • Busschots E
        • Matricali GA
        • Spaepen P
        • Meyer C
        • Desloovere K
        Repeatability of a 3D multi-segment foot model protocol in presence of foot deformities.
        Gait Posture. 2012; 36: 635-638
        • Deschamps K
        • Dingenen B
        • Pans F
        • Van Bavel I
        • Matricali GA
        • Staes F
        Effect of taping on foot kinematics in persons with chronic ankle instability.
        J Sci Med Sport. 2016; 19: 541-546
        • Chang R
        • Rodriques PA
        • Van Emmerik RE
        • Hamill J
        Multi-segment foot kinematics and ground reaction forces during gait of individuals with plantar fasciitis.
        J Biomech. 2014; 47: 2571-2577
        • Bishop C
        • Paul G
        • Thewlis D
        Recommendations for the reporting of foot and ankle models.
        J Biomech. 2012; 45: 2185-2194
        • Rankine L
        • Long J
        • Canseco K
        • Harris G
        Multisegmental foot modeling: a review.
        Biomed Eng. 2008; 36: 127-181
        • Knottnerus JA
        • Buntinx F
        The Evidence Base of Clinical Diagnosis: Theory and Methods of Diagnostic Research.
        Wiley, New York2011
        • Becker HP
        • Rosenbaum D
        • Kriese T
        • Gerngross H
        • Claes L
        Gait asymmetry following successful surgical treatment of ankle fractures in young adults.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995; 311: 262-269
        • Losch A
        • Meybohm P
        • Schmalz T
        • Fuchs M
        • Vamvukakis F
        • Dresing K
        • Blumentritt S
        • Stürmer KM
        Functional results of dynamic gait analysis after 1 year of hobby-athletes with a surgically treated ankle fracture.
        Sportverletz Sportschaden. 2002; 16: 101-107
        • Bozkurt M
        • Kentell BB
        • Yavuzer G
        • Oçgüder A
        • Heycan C
        • Tonuk E
        Functional evaluation of intraarticular severely comminuted fractures of the calcaneus with gait analysis.
        J Foot Ankle Surg. 2004; 43: 374-379
        • Kitaoka HB
        • Schaap EJ
        • Chao EY
        • An KN
        Displaced intra-articular fractures of the calcaneus treated non-operatively. Clinical results and analysis of motion and ground-reaction and temporal forces.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1994; 76: 1531-1540
        • Kingwell S
        • Buckley R
        • Willis N
        The association between subtalar joint motion and outcome satisfaction in patients with displaced intraarticular calcaneal fractures.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2004; 25: 666-673
        • Delahunt E
        • Monaghan K
        • Caulfield B
        Altered neuromuscular control and ankle joint kinematics during walking in subjects with functional instability of the ankle joint.
        Am J Sports Med. 2006; 34: 1970-1976
        • Monaghan K
        • Delahunt E
        • Caulfield B
        Ankle function during gait in patients with chronic ankle instability compared to controls.
        Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2006; 21: 168-174