Research Article| Volume 58, ISSUE 4, P696-701, July 2019

Download started.


Patient-Reported Outcomes of Achilles Tendon Repair Using the Modified Gift-Box Technique With Nonabsorbable Suture Loop: A Consecutive Case Series


      We sought to determine the early range of motion, complication rates, and 1-year patient-reported outcomes following Achilles tendon repair, using a modified gift-box suture loop technique. Sixty consecutive patients (49 males, mean age 36.2 ± 9.9 years) who underwent Achilles tendon repair with a modified gift-box suture loop technique performed by a single surgeon were prospectively enrolled. The range of motion at the final follow-up visit (mean 6 months) and the Achilles tendon rupture score (ATRS) and the complication rates at 1 year were obtained with 83% follow-up. The predictors of complications and ATRS were assessed. The mean operative time was 63.1 ± 10.8 minutes, which decreased throughout the case series (r = 0.46, p < .001). The mean plantarflexion at the final office evaluation was 31.7° ± 6.2°, dorsiflexion was 11.7° ± 6.3°, and total ankle arc of motion was 43.6° ± 9.7°; longer length of follow-up was associated with greater dorsiflexion (p = .008) and the total arc of motion (p = .008) but not with plantarflexion (p = .16). The overall rerupture rate was 1.7% (1 patient), wound complication rate was 1.7% (1 patient), and the overall complication rate was 6.7% (4 patients). No predictors of complications were identified. Complication rates did not differ between the first 30 (6.7%) cases and second 30 (6.7%) cases. The mean ATRS at 1 year was 81.8 ± 16.8 points. The rerupture and overall complication rates by 1 year were low. The range of motion, particularly dorsiflexion, improved through at least 6 months. Diabetic patients had lower 1-year ATRS than nondiabetic patients using this technique.

      Level of Clinical Evidence


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Labib SA
        • Rolf R
        • Dacus R
        • Hutton WC
        The “giftbox” repair of the Achilles tendon: a modification of the Krackow technique.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2009; 30: 410-414
        • Keller A
        • Ortiz C
        • Wagner E
        • Wagner P
        • Mococain P
        Mini-open tenorrhaphy of acute Achilles tendon ruptures: medium-term follow-up of 100 cases.
        Am J Sports Med. 2014; 42: 731-736
        • Bhandari M
        • Guyatt GH
        • Siddiqui F
        • Morrow F
        • Busse J
        • Leighton RK
        • Sprague S
        • Schemitsch EH
        Treatment of acute Achilles tendon ruptures: a systematic overview and metaanalysis.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002; 400: 190-200
        • Wilkins R
        • Bisson LJ
        Operative versus nonoperative management of acute Achilles tendon ruptures: a quantitative systematic review of randomized controlled trials.
        Am J Sports Med. 2012; 40: 2154-2160
        • Wong J
        • Barrass V
        • Maffulli N
        Quantitative review of operative and nonoperative management of Achilles tendon ruptures.
        Am J Sports Med. 2002; 30: 565-575
        • Carmont MR
        • Silbernagel KG
        • Nilsson-Helander K
        • Mei-Dan O
        • Karlsson J
        • Maffulli N
        Cross cultural adaptation of the Achilles tendon total rupture score with reliability, validity and responsiveness evaluation.
        Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013; 21: 1356-1360
        • Maffulli N
        • Longo UG
        • Maffulli GD
        • Khanna A
        • Denaro V
        Achilles tendon ruptures in diabetic patients.
        Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2011; 131: 33-38
        • Clanton TO
        • Haytmanek CT
        • Williams BT
        • Civitarese DM
        • Turnbull TL
        • Massey MB
        • Wijdicks CA
        • LaPrade RF
        A biomechanical comparison of an open repair and 3 minimally invasive percutaneous Achilles tendon repair techniques during a simulated, progressive rehabilitation protocol.
        Am J Sports Med. 2015; 43: 1957-1964
        • Watson TW
        • Jurist KA
        • Yang KH
        • Shen KL
        The strength of Achilles tendon repair: an in vitro study of the biomechanical behavior in human cadaver tendons.
        Foot Ankle Int. 1995; 16: 191-195
        • Van Dyke RO
        • Chaudhary SA
        • Gould G
        • Trimba R
        • Laughlin RT
        Biomechanical head-to-head comparison of 2 sutures and the giftbox versus Bunnell techniques for midsubstance Achilles tendon ruptures.
        Orthop J Sports Med. 2017; 52325967117707477
        • Labib SA
        • Hoffler CE
        • Shah JN
        • Rolf RH
        • Tingan A
        The gift box open Achilles tendon repair method: a retrospective clinical series.
        J Foot Ankle Surg. 2016; 55: 39-44
        • Miller TL
        • Harwood JL
        • Harrison RK
        • Nerone VS
        Achilles tendon repair using nonabsorbable suture loop for modified giftbox technique.
        Tech Orthop. 2015; 30: 33-38
        • Jaakkola JI
        • Hutton WC
        • Beskin JL
        • Lee GP
        Achilles tendon rupture repair: biomechanical comparison of the triple bundle technique versus the Krakow locking loop technique.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2000; 21: 14-17
        • Deramo DM
        • White KL
        • Parks BG
        • Hinton RY
        Krackow locking stitch versus nonlocking premanufactured loop stitch for soft-tissue fixation: a biomechanical study.
        Arthroscopy. 2008; 24: 599-603
        • Sadoghi P
        • Rosso C
        • Valderrabano V
        • Leithner A
        • Vavken P
        Initial Achilles tendon repair strength–synthesized biomechanical data from 196 cadaver repairs.
        Int Orthop. 2012; 36: 1947-1951
        • Nilsson-Helander K
        • Thomee R
        • Silbernagel KG
        • Thomee P
        • Faxen E
        • Eriksson BI
        • Karlsson J
        The Achilles tendon total rupture score (ATRS): development and validation.
        Am J Sports Med. 2007; 35: 421-426
        • Labib S
        • Hage WD
        • Sutton KM
        • Hutton W
        The effect of ankle position on the static tension in the Achilles tendon before and after operative repair: a biomechanical cadaver study.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2007; 28: 478-481
        • Soroceanu A
        • Sidhwa F
        • Aarabi S
        • Kaufman A
        • Glazebrook M
        Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012; 94: 2136-2143
        • Jones MP
        • Khan RJ
        • Carey Smith RL
        Surgical interventions for treating acute Achilles tendon rupture: key findings from a recent Cochrane review.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012; 94: e88
        • Bruggeman NB
        • Turner NS
        • Dahm DL
        • Voll AE
        • Hoskin TL
        • Jacofsky DJ
        • Haidukewych GJ
        Wound complications after open Achilles tendon repair: an analysis of risk factors.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004; 427: 63-66
        • Becher C
        • Donner S
        • Brucker J
        • Daniilidis K
        • Thermann H
        Outcome after operative treatment for chronic versus acute Achilles tendon rupture: a comparative analysis.
        Foot Ankle Surg. 2018; 24: 110-114
        • Bullock MJ
        • DeCarbo WT
        • Hofbauer MH
        • Thun JD
        Repair of chronic Achilles ruptures has a high incidence of venous thromboembolism.
        Foot Ankle Spec. 2014; 10: 415-420