Research Article| Volume 58, ISSUE 4, P730-733, July 2019

Calcaneal Bone Graft Procedures: An Analysis of Postsurgical Complications


      The purpose of this article is to examine complications in patients who underwent bone grafting from the calcaneus between December 2001 and June 2010. This retrospective, single-practice study included 247 procedures in 242 patients, including 200 (82.64%) female and 42 (17.36%) male patients, ranging in age from 13 to 89 (median 49) years. Overall, the incidence of experiencing any form of complication was 2.43% (6 of 247); these included 5 (2.02%) feet that displayed donor site sural neuritis and 1 (0.41) that displayed a painful, hypertrophic scar at the donor site. The only statistically significant risk factor associated with the development of a calcaneal donor site complication was white race (being African American was protective). These findings indicate that procurement of autogenous bone graft from the calcaneus, as described in this report, is safe and dependable with a low incidence of complications, and irritation of the sural nerve is the most common complication associated with the procedure. Further clinical and long-term follow-up studies controlling for confounding variables need to be performed to fully determine the overall safety and efficacy of this procedure.

      Level of Clinical Evidence


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Hahne J
        • Chiodo C
        • Wilson M
        • Glowacki J
        Autogenous bone grafts in foot and ankle surgery.
        Orthop J Harv Med Sch. 2007; 9 (Accessed September 25, 2010): 113-116
        • Hofbauer M
        • Delmonte R
        • Scripps M
        Autogenous bone grafting.
        J Foot Ankle Surg. 1996; 35: 386-390
        • Schade V
        • Roukis T
        Percutaneous bone marrow aspirate and bone graft harvesting techniques in the lower extremity.
        Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2008; 25: 733-742
        • Lindsey RW
        • Miclau T
        • Probe R
        • Perren S
        A defect in continuity in the canine femur: an in vivo experimental model for the study of bone graft incorporation.
        Yale J Biol Med. 1993; 66: 157-163
        • Myeroff C
        • Archdeacon M
        Autogenous bone graft: donor sites and techniques.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011; 93: 2227-2236
        • Costa Mendes L
        • Sauvigné T
        • Guiol J
        [Morbidity of autologous bone harvesting in implantology: literature review from 1990 to 2015].
        Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac Chir Orale. 2016; 117: 388-402
        • Chou LB
        • Mann RA
        • Coughlin MJ
        • McPeake WT, 3rd
        • Mizel MS
        Stress fracture as a complication of autogenous bone graft harvest from the distal tibia.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2007; 28: 199-201
        • Feeney S
        • Rees S
        • Tagoe M
        Tricortical calcaneal bone graft and management of the donor site.
        J Foot Ankle Surg. 2007; 46: 80-85
        • DiDomenico L
        • Haro A
        Percutaneous harvest of calcaneal bone graft.
        J Foot Ankle Surg. 2006; 45: 131-133
        • Mendicino V
        • Leonheart E
        • Schromoff P
        Techniques for harvesting autogenous bone grafts of the lower extremity.
        J Foot Ankle Surg. 1996; 35: 428-435
        • O'Malley MJ
        • Sayres SC
        • Saleem O
        • Levine D
        • Roberts M
        • Deland JT
        • Ellis S
        Morbidity and complications following percutaneous calcaneal autograft bone harvest.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2014; 35: 30-37
      1. Dehne R. Congenital and acquired neurologic disorders. In: R Dehne, MJ Coughlin, RA Mann, CL Saltzman, eds. Surgery of the Foot and Ankle. Mosby Elsevier, Philadelphia, 2007.

        • Mahan K
        Calcaneal donor bone grafts.
        J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 1994; 84: 1-9
        • Biddinger K
        • Komenda G
        • Schon L
        • Myerson M
        A new modified technique for harvest of calcaneal bone grafts in surgery on the foot and ankle.
        Foot Ankle Int. 1998; 19: 322-326
        • Nigro N
        • Grace D
        Radiographic evaluation of bone grafts.
        J Foot Ankle Surg. 1996; 35: 378-385
        • Greenland S
        Basic methods for sensitivity analysis of biases.
        Int J Epidemiol. 1996; 25: 1107-1116
        • Geiderman W
        • Farly J
        • Brodsky J
        Clinical results of harvesting autogenous cancellous graft from the ipsilateral proximal tibia for use in foot and ankle surgery.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2004; 25: 451-455
        • Raikin S
        • Brislin K
        Local bone graft harvested from the distal tibia or calcaneus for surgery of the foot and ankle.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2005; 26: 449-453
        • Roukis T
        • Hyer C
        • Philbin T
        • Berlet G
        • Lee T
        Complications associated with autogenous bone marrow aspirate harvest from the lower extremity: an observational cohort study.
        J Foot Ankle Surg. 2009; 48: 668-671