Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 58, ISSUE 4, P734-738, July 2019

Computed Tomography Analysis for Quantification of Displacement of the Distal Fibula in Different Foot Positions With Weightbearing and Sequentially Increased Instability: An Anatomic Cadaveric Study on Syndesmosis

      Abstract

      Syndesmotic injuries are quite common, but accurate diagnosis and treatment can be difficult, in part because of individual anatomic variation and complex movements of the fibula in the incisura. The current cadaveric study was designed to investigate changes in the position of the fibula in the incisura during simulated weightbearing in different foot positions and with sequential sectioning of syndesmotic and deltoid ligaments. Sixteen paired, fresh-frozen cadaveric limbs were embedded in polymethylmethacrylate mid-calf and placed in a weightbearing simulation frame. Computed tomography scans were obtained while the legs were in a simulated foot-flat position (75 N) and single-leg stance (700 N) in 5 foot positions: neutral, 15° external rotation, 15° internal rotation, 20° dorsiflexion, and 20° plantar flexion. The anterior-inferior tibiofibular ligament, posterior tibiofibular ligament complex, deltoid, and interosseous membranes were sectioned sequentially and rescanned. Measurements of fibular diastasis, rotation, anterior-posterior and medial-lateral translation, and fibular shortening were performed. The most destructive state resulted in the largest displacement at the syndesmosis. The degree of subluxation in all ligament states was dependent on the foot position. External rotation created statistically significant displacement at all levels of injury. There were no significant differences between sides of the same donor. Our data demonstrate the importance of foot position in reduction at the syndesmosis under weightbearing. The current ex vivo model could be used to evaluate other aspects of this injury or the value of reconstructive techniques in the future.

      Level of Clinical Evidence

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Lindsjo U
        Operative treatment of ankle fractures.
        Acta Orthop Scand Suppl. 1981; 189: 1-131
        • Leeds HC
        • Ehrlich MG
        Instability of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis after bimalleolar and trimalleolar ankle fractures.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984; 66: 490-503
        • Weening B
        • Bhandari M
        Predictors of functional outcome following transsyndesmotic screw fixation of ankle fractures.
        J Orthop Trauma. 2005; 19: 102-108
        • Lilyquist M
        • Shaw A
        • Latz K
        • Bogener J
        • Wentz B
        Cadaveric analysis of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2016; 37: 882-890
        • Williams BT
        • Ahrberg AB
        • Goldsmith MT
        • Campbell KJ
        • Shirley L
        • Wijdicks CA
        • LaPrade RF
        • Clanton TQ
        Ankle syndesmosis: a qualitative and quantitative anatomic analysis.
        Am J Sports Med. 2015; 43: 88-97
        • Beumer A
        • Valstar ER
        • Garling EH
        • Niesing R
        • Ranstam J
        • Löfvenberg R
        • Swierstra BA
        Kinematics of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis: radiostereometry in 11 normal ankles.
        Acta Orthop Scand. 2003; 74: 337-343
        • Nault ML
        • Marien M
        • Hébert-Davies J
        • Laflamme GY
        • Pelsser V
        • Rouleau DM
        • Gosselin-Papadopoulos N
        • Leduc S
        MRI quantification of the impact of ankle position on syndesmosis anatomy.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2017; 38: 215-219
        • Beumer A
        • Valstar ER
        • Garling EH
        • Niesing R
        • Ginai AZ
        • Ranstam J
        • Swierstra BA
        Effects of ligament sectioning on the kinematics of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis: a radiostereometric study of 10 cadaveric specimens based on presumed trauma mechanisms with suggestions for treatment.
        Acta Orthop. 2006; 77: 531-540
        • Sagi HC
        • Shah AR
        • Sanders RW
        The functional consequence of syndesmotic joint malreduction at a minimum 2-year follow-up.
        J Orthop Trauma. 2012; 26: 439-443
        • Malhotra G
        • Cameron J
        • Toolan BC
        Diagnosing chronic diastasis of the syndesmosis: a novel measurement using computed tomography.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2014; 35: 483-488
        • Phisitkul P
        • Ebinger T
        • Goetz J
        • Vaseenon T
        • Marsh JL
        Forceps reduction of the syndesmosis in rotational ankle fractures: a cadaveric study.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012; 94: 2256-2261
        • Nault ML
        • Hebert-Davies J
        • Laflamme GY
        • Leduc S
        CT scan assessmentof the syndesmosis: a new reproducible method.
        J Orthop Trauma. 2013; 27: 638-641
        • Rolfe B
        • Nordt W
        • Sallis JG
        • Distefano M
        Assessing fibular length using bimalleolar angular measurements.
        Foot Ankle. 1989; 10: 104-109
        • Mendelsohn ES
        • Hoshino CM
        • Harris TG
        • Zinar DM
        CT characterizing the anatomy of uninjured ankle syndesmosis.
        Orthopedics. 2014; 37: e157-e160
        • Kennedy JG
        • Soffe KE
        • Dalla Vedova P
        • Stephens MM
        • O'Brien T
        • Walsh MG
        • McManus F
        Evaluation of the syndesmotic screw in low Weber C ankle fractures.
        J Orthop Trauma. 2000; 14: 359-366
        • Close JR
        Some applications of the functional anatomy of the ankle joint.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1956; 38: 761-781
        • Boytim MJ
        • Fischer DA
        • Neumann L
        Syndesmotic ankle sprains.
        Am J Sports Med. 1991; 19: 294-298
        • Knops SP
        • Kohn MA
        • Hansen EN
        • Matityahu A
        • Marmor M
        Rotational malreduction of the syndesmosis: reliability and accuracy of computed tomography measurement methods.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2013; 34: 1403-1410
        • Kelikian H
        • Kelikian AS
        Disorders of the ankle.
        WB Saunders Company, Philadelphia, PA1985
        • Ogilvie-Harris DJ
        • Reed SC
        • Hedman TP
        Disruption of the ankle syndesmosis: biomechanical study of the ligamentous restraints.
        Arthroscopy. 1994; 10: 558-560
        • Wagener ML
        • Beumer A
        • Swierstra BA
        Chronic instability of the anterior tibiofibular syndesmosis of the ankle. Arthroscopic findings and results of anatomical reconstruction.
        BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011; 12: 212
        • van den Bekerom MP
        • Lamme B
        • Hogervorst M
        • Bolhuis HW
        Which ankle fractures require syndesmotic stabilization?.
        J Foot Ankle Surg. 2007; 46: 456-463
        • Schreiber JJ
        • McLawhorn AS
        • Dy CJ
        • Goldwyn EM
        Intraoperative contralateral view for assessing accurate syndesmosis reduction.
        Orthopedics. 2013; 36: 360-361