Financial Impact of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Surgical Treatment of Foot and Ankle Osteomyelitis


      Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is generally considered the most sensitive imaging for diagnosis of osteomyelitis; however, it is associated with significant cost and is at times ordered as initial screening imaging when a less resource-intensive test would suffice. The purpose of this retrospective cohort study was to examine the differences between patients with osteomyelitis of the foot and ankle, and their subsequent treatment course, who underwent MRI compared with those who did not. Financial impact of MRI as it relates to clinical decision-making was also calculated. Patients treated for a diagnosis of osteomyelitis of the foot and ankle from 2009 to 2015 were retrospectively identified. Demographics, imaging modalities, and operative procedures for each patient were collected. An “impact MRI” was defined as one that led to a subsequent operative procedure within the same admission. The impact cost of an MRI was estimated using the equation: (average MRI cost) × (total MRIs/impact MRIs). A total of 144 patients underwent 220 MRIs, and 399 patients did not have MRIs. The operative rate between the 2 groups was similar (70.8% versus 70.4%, p = .93). Multiple linear regression showed that MRI was not a significant predictor of operation (p = .50). However, we found a significant correlation between MRI use and operative intervention for patients with increased comorbidities. From 2011 to 2015, there was a significant increase in impact cost, while controlling for average MRI cost ($8172 to $15,292, p ≤ .05). Over the study period, the impact cost of an MRI significantly increased from 1.8 to 5.0 times the average cost.

      Level of Clinical Evidence


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic and Personal
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Kremers HM
        • Nwojo ME
        • Ransom JE
        • Wood-Wentz CM
        • Melton 3rd, LJ
        • Huddleston 3rd, PM
        Trends in the epidemiology of osteomyelitis: a population-based study, 1969 to 2009.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015; 97: 837-845
        • Lindbloom BJ
        • James ER
        • McGarvey WC
        Osteomyelitis of the foot and ankle: diagnosis, epidemiology, and treatment.
        Foot Ankle Clin. 2014; 19: 569-588
        • Hatzenbuehler J
        • Pulling TJ
        Diagnosis and management of osteomyelitis.
        Am Fam Physician. 2011; 84: 1027-1033
        • Henke PK
        • Blackburn SA
        • Wainess RW
        • Cowan J
        • Ternado A
        • Proctor M
        • Wakefield TW
        • Upchurch Jr, GR
        • Stanley JC
        • Greenfield LJ
        Osteomyelitis of the foot and toe in adults is a surgical disease: conservative management worsens lower extremity salvage.
        Ann Surg. 2005; 241: 885-892
        • Korenstein D
        • Chimonas S
        • Barrow B
        • Keyhani S
        • Troy A
        • Lipitz-Snyderman A
        Development of a conceptual map of negative consequences for patients of overuse of medical tests and treatments.
        JAMA Intern Med. 2018; 178: 1401-1407
        • Mavrogenis AF
        • Megaloikonomos PD
        • Antoniadou T
        • Igoumenou VG
        • Panagopoulos GN
        • Dimopoulos L
        • Moulakakis KG
        • Sfyroeras GS
        • Lazaris A
        Current concepts for the evaluation and management of diabetic foot ulcers.
        EFFORT Open Rev. 2018; 3: 513-525
        • Game FL
        Osteomyelitis in the diabetic foot: diagnosis and management.
        Med Clin North Am. 2013; 97: 947-956
        • Grayson ML
        • Gibbons GW
        • Balogh K
        • Levin E
        • Karchmer AW
        Probing to bone in infected pedal ulcers. A clinical sign of underlying osteomyelitis in diabetic patients.
        JAMA. 1995; 273: 721-723
        • Lam K
        • van Asten SA
        • Nguyen T
        • La Fontaine J
        • Lavery LA
        Diagnostic accuracy of probe to bone to detect osteomyelitis in the diabetic foot: a systematic review.
        Clin Infect Dis. 2016; 63: 944-948
        • Morales Lozano R
        • González Fernández ML
        • Martinez Hernández D
        • Beneit Montesinos JV
        • Guisado Jiménez S
        • Gonzalez Jurado MA
        Validating the probe-to-bone test and other tests for diagnosing chronic osteomyelitis in the diabetic foot.
        Diabetes Care. 2010; 33: 2140-2145
        • Malcius D
        • Jonkus M
        • Kuprionis G
        • Maleckas A
        • Monastyreckiene E
        • Uktveris R
        • Rinkevicius S
        • Barauskas V
        The accuracy of different imaging techniques in diagnosis of acute hematogenous osteomyelitis.
        Medicina (Kaunas). 2009; 45: 624-631
        • Joshi R
        • Smith S
        Is magnetic resonance imaging a suitable imaging modality for the diagnosis of osteomyelitis of the foot or ankle?.
        Can Assoc Radiol J. 2009; 60: 119-120
        • Kapoor A
        • Page S
        • Lavalley M
        • Gale DR
        • Felson DT
        Magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosing foot osteomyelitis: a meta-analysis.
        Arch Intern Med. 2007; 167: 125-132
        • McCarthy E
        • Morrison WB
        • Zoga AC
        MR imaging of the diabetic foot.
        Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2017; 25: 183-194
        • Peterson N
        • Widnall J
        • Evans P
        • Jackson G
        • Platt S
        Diagnostic imaging of diabetic foot disorders.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2017; 38: 86-95
        • Dinh T
        • Snyder G
        • Veves A
        Current techniques to detect foot infection in the diabetic patient.
        Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2010; 9: 24-30
        • Markanday A
        Diagnosing diabetic foot osteomyelitis: narrative review and a suggested 2-step score-based diagnostic pathway for clinicians.
        Open Forum Infect Dis. 2014; 1: ofu060
        • Charlson ME
        • Pompei P
        • Ales KL
        • MacKenzie CR
        A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.
        J Chronic Dis. 1987; 40: 373-383
        • Keeney JA
        • Nunley RM
        • Adelani M
        • Mall N
        Magnetic resonance imaging of the hip: poor cost utility for treatment of adult patients with hip pain.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014; 472: 787-792
        • Shank CF
        • Feibel JB
        Osteomyelitis in the diabetic foot: diagnosis and management.
        Foot Ankle Clin. 2006; 11: 775-789
        • Wukich DK
        • Hobizal KB
        • Sambenedetto TL
        • Kirby K
        • Rosario BL
        Outcomes of osteomyelitis in patients hospitalized with diabetic foot infections.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2016; 37: 1285-1291
        • Geraghty T
        • LaPorta G
        Current health and economic burden of chronic diabetic osteomyelitis.
        Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2019; 9: 1-8
        • Eckman MH
        • Greenfield S
        • Mackey WC
        • Wong JB
        • Kaplan S
        • Sullivan L
        • Dukes K
        • Pauker SG
        Foot infections in diabetic patients. Decision and cost-effectiveness analyses.
        JAMA. 1995; 273: 712-720
        • Kosinski MA
        • Lipsky BA
        Current medical management of diabetic foot infections.
        Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2010; 8: 1293-1305
        • Lipsky BA
        • Berendt AR
        • Cornia PB
        • Pile JC
        • Peters EJ
        • Armstrong DG
        • Deery HG
        • Embil JM
        • Joseph WS
        • Karchmer AW
        • Pinzur M
        • Senneville E
        Executive summary: 2012 Infectious Diseases Society of America clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of diabetic foot infections.
        Clin Infect Dis. 2012; 54: 1679-1684
        • Teh J
        • Berendt T
        • Lipsky BA
        Rational imaging. Investigating suspected bone infection in the diabetic foot.
        BMJ. 2009; 339: b4690
        • Ulcay A
        • Karakas A
        • Mutluoglu M
        • Uzun G
        • Turhan V
        • Ay H
        Antibiotherapy with and without bone debridement in diabetic foot osteomyelitis: a retrospective cohort study.
        Pak J Med Sci. 2014; 30: 28-31
        • Chow I
        • Lemos EV
        • Einarson TR
        Management and prevention of diabetic foot ulcers and infections: a health economic review.
        Pharmacoeconomics. 2008; 26: 1019-1035
        • Larson DL
        • Gilstrap J
        • Simonelic K
        • Carrera GF
        Is there a simple, definitive, and cost-effective way to diagnose osteomyelitis in the pressure ulcer patient?.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011; 127: 670-676
        • Berendt AR
        • Peters EJ
        • Bakker K
        • Embil JM
        • Eneroth M
        • Hinchliffe RJ
        • Jeffcoate WJ
        • Lipsky BA
        • Senneville E
        • Teh J
        • Valk GD
        Diabetic foot osteomyelitis: a progress report on diagnosis and a systematic review of treatment.
        Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2008; 24: S145-S161
        • Cavanagh P
        • Attinger C
        • Abbas Z
        • Bal A
        • Rojas N
        • Xu ZR
        Cost of treating diabetic foot ulcers in five different countries.
        Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2012; 28: 107-111
        • Donders AR
        • van der Heijden GJ
        • Stijnen T
        • Moons KG
        Review: a gentle introduction to imputation of missing values.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 2006; 59: 1087-1091
        • Loveman E
        • Jones J
        • Hartwell D
        • Bird A
        • Harris P
        • Welch K
        • Clegg A
        The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
        Health Technol Assess. 2010; 14: 1-204
        • Masconi KL
        • Matsha TE
        • Erasmus RT
        • Kengne AP
        Effects of different missing data imputation techniques on the performance of undiagnosed diabetes risk prediction models in a mixed-ancestry population of South Africa.
        PLoS One. 2015; 10e0139210