Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 61, ISSUE 2, P318-322, March 2022

Download started.

Ok

Patient Outcomes Following Extra-Osseous Talo-Tarsal Stabilization for Foot Hyperpronation

Published:September 08, 2021DOI:https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2021.09.002

      Abstract

      The aim is to present a single-center case series of patients with symptomatic hyperpronated feet treated with arthroereisis by using a second generation extra-osseous talo-tarsal stabilization device. This case series enrolled 123 feet in 87 patients (20 [6-75] years) treated with arthroereisis, either isolated (76 cases) or combined procedure (47 cases). At their final follow-up, a patient reported questionnaire (overall satisfaction, foot stability and shape, activities of daily living, pain level, and analgesics usage) was distributed. The average postoperative follow-up period was 30 (13-55) months. Nineteen (15%) cases required at least one revision surgery: the implant was manipulated in 5 (4%), while 14 cases (11%) required definitive implant removal. The predominant reason for implant removal was pain (50%), followed by implant migration (27%). The pediatric population with isolated procedure showed lowest revision rate (5%), while adults with combined ankle/hindfoot procedures demonstrated revision rate of 50%. The overall patient satisfaction after arthroereisis was 84%. The patients’ perceived improvement in foot stability was 75%, foot shape 85%, and activities of daily living 64%. Eighty-two percent of cases reported no analgesics usage in the last month and mean visual analogue scale (0-10) pain level decreased from 5.5 to 2.2 (p < .001). The subgroup analyses of patient-reported questionnaires revealed the best outcome in the pediatric-isolated cases, while adults with combined procedures reported the lowermost outcome. Extra-osseous talo-tarsal stabilization demonstrated a low rate of revisions surgery and a high satisfaction rate as an isolated procedure. Patients with conjoined procedures experienced more revisions and considerably lower satisfaction rates.

      Level of Clinical Evidence

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Toullec E
        Adult flatfoot.
        Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2015; 101: S11-S17
        • Carr JB
        • Yang S
        • Lather LA
        Pediatric pes planus: a state-of-the-art review.
        Pediatrics. 2016; 137: e20151230
        • Evans AM
        The flat-footed child—to treat or not to treat what is the clinician to do?.
        J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2008; 98: 386-393
        • Logue JD
        Advances in orthotics and bracing.
        Foot Ankle Clin. 2007; 12: 215-232
        • Blitz NM
        • Stabile RJ
        • Giorgini RJ
        • DiDomenico LA
        Flexible pediatric and adolescent pes planovalgus: conservative and surgical treatment options.
        Clin Podiatric Med Surg. 2010; 27: 59-77
        • Banwell HA
        • Mackintosh S
        • Thewlis D
        Foot orthoses for adults with flexible pes planus: a systematic review.
        J Foot Ankle Res. 2014; 7
        • Jane MacKenzie A
        • Rome K
        • Evans AM
        The efficacy of nonsurgical interventions for pediatric flexible flat foot: a critical review.
        J Pediatr Orthop. 2012; 32: 830-834
        • Yontar NS
        • Ogut T
        • Guven MF
        • Botanlioglu H
        • Kaynak G
        • Can A
        Surgical treatment results for flexible flatfoot in adolescents.
        Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2016; 50: 655-659
        • Myerson MS
        • Badekas A
        • Schon LC
        Treatment of stage II posterior tibial tendon deficiency with flexor digitorum longus tendon transfer and calcaneal osteotomy.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2004; 25: 445-450
        • LeLièvre J
        Current concepts and correction in the valgus foot.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1970; 70: 43-55
        • Chambers EF
        An operation for the correction of flexible flat feet of adolescents.
        West J Surg Obstet Gynecol. 1946; 54: 77-86
        • Bernasconi A
        • Lintz F
        • Sadile F
        The role of arthroereisis of the subtalar joint for flatfoot in children and adults.
        EFORT Open Rev. 2017; 2: 438-446
        • Graham ME
        • Jawrani NT
        Extraosseous talotarsal stabilization devices: a new classification system.
        J Foot Ankle Surg. 2012; 51: 613-619
        • Ozan F
        • Doğar F
        • Gençer K
        • Koyuncu S
        • Vatansever F
        • Duygulu F
        • Altay T
        Symptomatic flexible flatfoot in adults: subtalar arthroereisis.
        Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2015; 11: 1597-1602
        • Metcalfe SA
        • Bowling FL
        • Reeves ND
        Subtalar joint arthroereisis in the management of pediatric flexible flatfoot: a critical review of the literature.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2011; 32: 1127-1139
        • Van Aman SE
        • Rivera VR
        • Khazen GE
        • Schon LC
        Preliminary findings using subtalar arthroereisis as adjunct treatment for correction of flexible flatfoot: short-term radiographic results.
        J Foot Ankle. 2007; 1: 13-17
        • Zhu Y
        • Xu XY
        Treatment of stage II adult acquired flatfoot deformity with subtalar arthroereises.
        Foot Ankle Spec. 2015; 8: 194-202
        • Brancheau SP
        • Walker KM
        • Northcutt DR
        An analysis of outcomes after use of the Maxwell-Brancheau arthroereisis implant.
        J Foot Ankle Surg. 2012; 51: 3-8
        • Jay RM
        • Din N
        Correcting pediatric flatfoot with subtalar arthroereisis and gastrocnemius recession: a retrospective study.
        Foot Ankle Spec. 2013; 6: 101-107
        • Graham ME
        • Jawrani NT
        • Chikka A
        Extraosseous talotarsal stabilization using HyProCure ® in adults: a 5-year retrospective follow-up.
        J Foot Ankle Surg. 2012; 51: 23-29
        • Bresnahan PJ
        • Chariton JT
        • Vedpathak A
        Extraosseous talotarsal stabilization using HyProCure®: preliminary clinical outcomes of a prospective case series.
        J Foot Ankle Surg. 2013; 52: 195-202
        • Kellermann P
        • Roth S
        • Gion K
        • Boda K
        • Tóth K
        Calcaneo-stop procedure for paediatric flexible flatfoot.
        Arch Ortho Trauma Surg. 2011; 131: 1363-1367
        • Megremis P
        • Megremis O
        arthroereisis for symptomatic flexible flatfoot deformity in young children: radiological assessment and short-term follow-up.
        J Foot Ankle Surg. 2019; 58: 904-915
        • Chong DY
        • Macwilliams BA
        • Hennessey TA
        • Teske N
        • Stevens PM
        Prospective comparison of subtalar arthroereisis with lateral column lengthening for painful flatfeet.
        J Pediatr Orthop B. 2015; 24: 345-353
        • Viladot Voegeli A
        • Fontecilla Cornejo N
        • Serrá Sandoval JA
        • Alvarez Goenaga F
        • Viladot Pericé R
        Results of subtalar arthroereisis for posterior tibial tendon dysfunction stage IIA1. Based on 35 patients.
        Foot Ankle Surg. 2018; 24: 28-33
        • Nelson SC
        • Haycock DM
        • Little ER
        Flexible flatfoot treatment with arthroereisis: radiographic improvement and child health survey analysis.
        J Foot Ankle Surg. 2004; 43: 144-155
        • Scharer BM
        • Black BE
        • Sockrider N
        Treatment of painful pediatric flatfoot with Maxwell-Brancheau subtalar arthroereisis implant a retrospective radiographic review.
        Foot Ankle Spec. 2010; 3: 67-72
        • Giannini S
        • Ceccarelli F
        • Benedetti MG
        • Catani F
        • Faldini C
        Surgical treatment of flexible flatfoot in children: a four-year follow-up study.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001; 83: 73-79
        • Needleman RL
        A surgical approach for flexible flatfeet in adults including a subtalar arthroereisis with the MBA sinus tarsi implant.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2006; 27: 9-18
        • Bali N
        • Theivendran K
        • Prem H
        Computed tomography review of tarsal canal anatomy with reference to the fitting of sinus tarsi implants in the tarsal canal.
        J Foot Ankle Surg. 2013; 52: 714-716
        • Cook EA
        • Cook JJ
        • Basile P
        Identifying risk factors in subtalar arthroereisis explantation: a propensity-matched analysis.
        J Foot Ankle Surg. 2011; 50: 395-401
        • Saxena A
        • Via AG
        • Maffulli N
        • Chiu H
        Subtalar arthroereisis implant removal in adults: a prospective study of 100 patients.
        J Foot Ankle Surg. 2016; 55: 500-503
        • Scher DM
        • Bansal M
        • Handler-Matasar S
        • Bohne WH
        • Green DW
        Extensive implant reaction in failed subtalar joint arthroereisis: report of two cases.
        HSS J. 2007; 3: 177-181
        • Kumar V
        • Clough TM
        Talar neck fracture-a rare but important complication following subtalar arthroereisis.
        Foot. 2014; 24: 169-171
        • Corpuz M
        • Shofler D
        • Labovitz J
        • Hodor L
        • Yu K
        Fracture of the Talus as a complication of subtalar arthroereisis.
        J Foot Ankle Surg. 2012; 51: 91-94
        • Lui TH
        Spontaneous subtalar fusion: an irreversible complication of subtalar arthroereisis.
        J Foot Ankle Surg. 2014; 53: 652-656