Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 62, ISSUE 1, P39-44, January 2023

Download started.

Ok

Subjective and Objective Outcomes of Ankle Joint Arthrodesis with Either Ilizarov or Internal Fixation

Published:April 01, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2022.03.009

      ABSTRACT

      After arthroplasty, arthrodesis of the ankle joint is the most common method to treat advanced ankle osteoarthritis. The goal of the study was to assess the subjective and objective outcomes in 2 different types of fixation for ankle joint arthrodesis.
      We retrospectively assessed 47 patients who had undergone ankle joint arthrodesis with fixation either via an Ilizarov apparatus (group 1) (n = 21) or cannulated screws (group 2) (n = 26). The outcomes were measured by: (1) the quantity of analgesics administered, (2) the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle–hindfoot score, (3) general patient satisfaction, (4) the patients’ decision to undergo the same procedure given another chance, and (5) the necessity of blood transfusion during hospitalization. Data was collected at the last postoperative follow-up visit. The AOFAS scores in group 1 and group 2 patients were 73.9   ± 13 and 72.7  ±  14.3, respectively. In group 1, 17 patients (81%) were very satisfied with the results, while in group 2, 19 patients (73%) were very satisfied with the results (p = .043). Two group 1 patients (10%) and four group 2 patients (15.3%) reported that they were satisfied with the outcomes (p = .035). Two patients (10%) from group 1 and three patients (11%) from group 2 were fairly satisfied. Seventeen patients (81%) after arthrodesis with Ilizarov fixation and 21 patients (81%) after arthrodesis with internal fixation would choose the same procedure given the opportunity to choose again. In group 1 there were no patients who required blood transfusion; in group 2 one patient (4%) required blood transfusion; the difference was statistically significant (p = .039). Nineteen group 1 patients (90%) were administered an analgesic preoperatively, while postoperatively only 6 (29%) required analgesics. In group 2, 24 patients (92%) were administered analgesics preoperatively, with 8 (31%) of them still requiring analgesics postoperatively. Ankle arthrodesis patients from both group 1 and group 2 achieved good subjective and objective results of treatment. We noted slightly better results in the Ilizarov apparatus group.

      Level of Clinical Evidence

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Dalat F
        • Trouillet F
        • Fessy MH
        • Bourdin M
        • Besse JL.
        Comparison of quality of life following total ankle arthroplasty and ankle arthrodesis: retrospective study of 54 cases.
        Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2014; 100: 761-766
        • Braito M
        • Dammerer D
        • Kaufmann G
        • Fischler S
        • Carollo J
        • Reinthaler A
        • Huber D
        • Biedermann R.
        Are our expectations bigger than the results we achieve? A comparative study analysing potential advantages of ankle arthroplasty over arthrodesis.
        Int Orthop. 2014; 38: 1647-1653
        • Hendrickx RP
        • Stufkens SA
        • de Bruijn EE
        • Sierevelt IN
        • van Dijk CN
        • Kerkhoffs GM.
        Medium- to long-term outcome of ankle arthrodesis.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2011; 32: 940-947
        • Schuh R
        • Hofstaetter J
        • Krismer M
        • Bevoni R
        • Windhager R
        • Trnka HJ.
        Total ankle arthroplasty versus ankle arthrodesis. Comparison of sports, recreational activities and functional outcome.
        Int Orthop. 2012; 36: 1207-1214
        • Tellisi N
        • Fragomen AT
        • Ilizarov S
        • Rozbruch SR.
        Limb salvage reconstruction of the ankle with fusion and simultaneous tibial lengthening using the Ilizarov/Taylor spatial frame.
        HSS J. 2008; 4: 32-42
        • Morasiewicz P
        • Dejnek M
        • Urbański W
        • Dragan SŁ
        • Kulej M
        • Dragan SF.
        Radiological evaluation of ankle arthrodesis with Ilizarov fixation compared to internal fixation.
        Injury. 2017; 48: 1678-1683
        • Fragomen AT
        • Borst E
        • Schachter L
        • Lyman S
        • Rozbruch SR.
        Complex ankle arthrodesis using the Ilizarov method yields high rate of fusion.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012; 470: 2864-2873
        • Rabinovich RV
        • Haleem AM
        • Rozbruch SR.
        Complex ankle arthrodesis: review of the literature.
        World J Orthop. 2015; 6: 602-613
        • Siebachmeyer M
        • Boddu K
        • Bilal A
        • Hester TW
        • Hardwick T
        • Fox TP
        • Edmonds M
        • Kavarthapu V.
        Outcome of one-stage correction of deformities of the ankle and hindfoot and fusion in Charcot neuroarthropathy using a retrograde intramedullary hindfoot arthrodesis nail.
        Bone Joint J. 2015; 97-B: 76-82
        • Perlman MH
        • Thordarson DB.
        Ankle fusion in a high risk population: an assessment of nonunion risk factors.
        Foot Ankle Int. 1999; 20: 491-496
        • Chahal J
        • Stephen DJ
        • Bulmer B
        • Daniels T
        • Kreder HJ.
        Factors associated with outcome after subtalar arthrodesis.
        J Orthop Trauma. 2006; 20: 555-561
        • Jiang JJ
        • Schipper ON
        • Whyte N
        • Koh JL
        • Toolan BC.
        Comparison of perioperative complications and hospitalization outcomes after ankle arthrodesis versus total ankle arthroplasty from 2002 to 2011.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2015; 36: 360-368
        • Katsenis D1
        • Bhave A
        • Paley D
        • Herzenberg JE.
        Treatment of malunion and nonunion at the site of an ankle fusion with the Ilizarov apparatus.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005; 87: 302-309
        • Onodera T1
        • Majima T
        • Kasahara Y
        • Takahashi D
        • Yamazaki S
        • Ando R
        • Minami A.
        Outcome of transfibular ankle arthrodesis with Ilizarov apparatus.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2012; 33: 964-968
        • Salem KH
        • Kinzl L
        • Schmelz A.
        Ankle arthrodesis using Ilizarov ring fixators: a review of 22 cases.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2006; 27: 764-770
        • Ling JS
        • Smyth NA
        • Fraser EJ
        • Hogan MV
        • Seaworth CM
        • Ross KA
        • Kennedy JG.
        Investigating the relationship between ankle arthrodesis and adjacent-joint arthritis in the hindfoot: a systematic review.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015; 97: 513-520
        • Houdek MT
        • Wilke BK
        • Ryssman DB
        • Turner NS.
        Radiographic and functional outcomes following bilateral ankle fusions.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2014; 35: 1250-1254
        • Strasser NL
        • Turner NS.
        Functional outcomes after ankle arthrodesis in elderly patients.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2012; 33: 699-703
        • Slater GL
        • Sayres SC
        • O'Malley MJ
        Anterior ankle arthrodesis.
        World J Orthop. 2014; 5: 1-5
        • Kitaoka HB
        • Alexander IJ
        • Adelaar RS
        • Nunley JA
        • Myerson MS
        • Sanders M.
        Clinical rating systems for the ankle-hindfoot, midfoot, hallux, and lesser toes.
        Foot Ankle Int. 1994; 15: 349-353
        • Ibrahim T
        • Beiri A
        • Azzabi M
        • Best AJ
        • Taylor GJ
        • Menon DK.
        Reliability and validity of the subjective component of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society clinical rating scales.
        J Foot Ankle Surg. 2007; 46: 65-74
        • Hoover JR1
        • Santrock RD
        • James 3rd, WC
        Ankle fusion stability: a biomechanical comparison of external versus internal fixation.
        Orthopedics. 2011; 34https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20110228-04
        • Rozis M
        • Benetos I
        • Afrati SR
        • Polyzois VD
        • Pneumaticos SG.
        Results and outcomes of combined cross screw and Ilizarov external fixator frame in ankle fusion.
        J Foot Ankle Surg. 2020; 59: 337-342
        • Matsumoto T
        • Yasunaga H
        • Matsui H
        • Fushimi K
        • Izawa N
        • Yasui T
        • Kadono Y
        • Tanaka S.
        Time trends and risk factors for perioperative complications in total ankle arthroplasty: retrospective analysis using a national database in Japan.
        BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016; 17: 450
        • Teramoto A
        • Nozaka K
        • Kamiya T
        • Kashiwagura T
        • Shoji H
        • Watanabe K
        • Shimada Y
        • Yamashita T.
        Screw internal fixation and Ilizarov external fixation: a comparison of outcomes in ankle arthrodesis.
        J Foot Ankle Surg. 2020; 59: 343-346
        • Ma N
        • Li Z
        • Li D
        • Hu Y
        • Sun N.
        Clinical evaluation of arthrodesis with Ilizarov external fixator for the treatment of end-stage ankle osteoarthritis: a retrospective study.
        Medicine (Baltimore). 2020; 99: e23921