Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 62, ISSUE 1, P61-67, January 2023

Download started.

Ok

Jigless Knotless Internal Brace Versus Other Minimal Invasive Achilles Tendon Repair Techniques in Biomechanical Testing Simulating the Progressive Rehabilitation Protocol

Published:April 02, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2022.03.014

      Abstract

      The jigless knotless internal brace surgery (JKIB), an alternative method for minimal invasive surgery (MIS) repair of acute Achilles tendon rupture, has advantages of preventing sural-nerve injury in MIS and superficial wound infection in open surgery, as previous clinical research demonstrates. However, no comparative study on the biomechanical performance between JKIB and other MIS techniques has been reported until now. In this study, 50 fresh porcine Achilles tendons were used to compare the JKIB with open surgery (two-stranded Krachow suture) with other MIS techniques, including Percutaneus Achilles Repair System (PARS), Speedbridge (SB), and Achillon Achilles Tendon Suture System (ACH), using a biomechanical testing with cyclic loading at 1 Hz. This test was used to simulate a progressive rehabilitation protocol where 20 to 100 N was applied in the first 250 cycles, followed by 20 to 190 N in the second 250 cycles, and then 20 to 369 N in the third 250 cycles. The cyclic displacement after 10, 100 and 250 cycles were recorded. The survived cycles were defined as a sudden drop in measured load. In survived cycles, the JKIB group (552.3 ± 72.8) had significantly higher cycles than the open, PARS, and ACH groups (204.3 ± 33.3, 395.9 ± 96.0, and 397.1 ± 80.9, respectively, p < .01) as analyzed by post hoc analysis, but no significant difference as compared with the SB group (641.6 ± 48.7). In cyclic displacement after 250 cyclic loadings, the JKIB group (11.29 ± 1.29) showed no significant difference as compared with PARS, SB, and ACH groups (12.21 ± 1.18, 9.80 ± 0.80, and 11.57 ± 1.10 mm, respectively) and significant less displacement than the open group (14.50 ± 1.85, p < .01). These findings suggest that JKIB could be an option for acute Achilles tendon repair in the MIS fashion due to no larger cyclic elongation compared with other MIS techniques.

      Level of Clinical Evidence

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      Reference

        • Huttunen TT
        • Kannus P
        • Rolf C
        • Fellander-Tsai L
        • Mattila VM.
        Acute achilles tendon ruptures: incidence of injury and surgery in Sweden between 2001 and 2012.
        Am J Sports Med. 2014; 42: 2419
        • Carmont MR
        • Rossi R
        • Scheffler S
        • Mei-Dan O
        • Beaufils P.
        Percutaneous & mini invasive Achilles tendon repair.
        Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Ther Technol. 2011; 3: 28
        • Khan RJ
        • Fick D
        • Keogh A
        • Crawford J
        • Brammar T
        • Parker M.
        Treatment of acute achilles tendon ruptures. A meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005; 87: 2202
        • Avina Valencia JA
        • Guillen Alcala MA
        Repair of acute Achilles tendon rupture. Comparative study of two surgical techniques.
        Acta Ortop Mex. 2009; 23: 125
        • Bevoni R
        • Angelini A
        • D'Apote G
        • Berti L
        • Fusaro I
        • Ellis S
        • Schuh R
        • Girolami M
        Long term results of acute Achilles repair with triple-bundle technique and early rehabilitation protocol.
        Injury. 2014; 45: 1268
        • Uquillas CA
        • Guss MS
        • Ryan DJ
        • Jazrawi LM
        • Strauss EJ.
        Everything Achilles: knowledge update and current concepts in management: AAOS exhibit selection.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015; 97: 1187
        • Yin L
        • Wu Y
        • Ren C
        • Wang Y
        • Fu T
        • Cheng X
        • Li R
        • Nie M
        • Mu Y.
        Treatment of acute achilles tendon rupture with the panda rope bridge technique.
        Injury. 2018; 49: 726
        • Huang J
        • Wang C
        • Ma X
        • Wang X
        • Zhang C
        • Chen L.
        Rehabilitation regimen after surgical treatment of acute Achilles tendon ruptures: a systematic review with meta-analysis.
        Am J Sports Med. 2015; 43: 1008
        • Keating JF
        • Will EM.
        Operative versus non-operative treatment of acute rupture of tendo Achillis: a prospective randomised evaluation of functional outcome.
        J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011; 93: 1071
        • Soroceanu A
        • Sidhwa F
        • Aarabi S
        • Kaufman A
        • Glazebrook M.
        Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012; 94: 2136
        • Olsson N
        • Silbernagel KG
        • Eriksson BI
        • Sansone M
        • Brorsson A
        • Nilsson-Helander K
        • Karlsson J.
        Stable surgical repair with accelerated rehabilitation versus nonsurgical treatment for acute Achilles tendon ruptures: a randomized controlled study.
        Am J Sports Med. 2013; 41: 2867
        • McMahon SE
        • Smith TO
        • Hing CB.
        A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials comparing conventional to minimally invasive approaches for repair of an Achilles tendon rupture.
        Foot Ankle Surg. 2011; 17: 211
        • Hsu AR
        • Jones CP
        • Cohen BE
        • Davis WH
        • Ellington JK
        • Anderson RB.
        Clinical outcomes and complications of percutaneous Achilles repair system versus open technique for acute Achilles tendon ruptures.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2015; 36: 1279
        • Cox JT
        • Shorten PL
        • Gould GC
        • Markert RJ
        • Barnett Jr., MD
        • Laughlin RT
        Knotted versus knotless suture bridge repair of the achilles tendon insertion: a biomechanical study.
        Am J Sports Med. 2014; 42: 2727
        • Huffard B
        • O'Loughlin PF
        • Wright T
        • Deland J
        • Kennedy JG.
        Achilles tendon repair: Achillon system vs. Krackow suture: an anatomic in vitro biomechanical study.
        Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2008; 23: 1158
        • Citak M
        • Knobloch K
        • Albrecht K
        • Krettek C
        • Hufner T.
        Anatomy of the sural nerve in a computer-assisted model: implications for surgical minimal-invasive Achilles tendon repair.
        Br J Sports Med. 2007; 41: 456
        • Klein W
        • Lang DM
        • Saleh M.
        The use of the Ma-Griffith technique for percutaneous repair of fresh ruptured tendo Achillis.
        Chir Organi Mov. 1991; 76: 223
        • Paavola M
        • Orava S
        • Leppilahti J
        • Kannus P
        • Jarvinen M.
        Chronic Achilles tendon overuse injury: complications after surgical treatment. An analysis of 432 consecutive patients.
        Am J Sports Med. 2000; 28: 77
        • Porter KJ
        • Robati S
        • Karia P
        • Portet M
        • Szarko M
        • Amin A.
        An anatomical and cadaveric study examining the risk of sural nerve injury in percutaneous Achilles tendon repair using the Achillon device.
        Foot Ankle Surg. 2014; 20: 90
        • Blackmon JA
        • Atsas S
        • Clarkson MJ
        • Fox JN
        • Daney BT
        • Dodson SC
        • Lambert HW.
        Locating the sural nerve during calcaneal (Achilles) tendon repair with confidence: a cadaveric study with clinical applications.
        J Foot Ankle Surg. 2013; 52: 42
        • Ko PY
        • Huang MT
        • Li CL
        • Su WR
        • Jou IM
        • Wu PT.
        Jigless knotless internal brace technique for acute Achilles tendon rupture: a case series study.
        J Orthop Surg Res. 2019; 14: 415
        • Ko PY
        • Hsu CH
        • Hong CK
        • Hung MT
        • Su WR
        • Wu PT
        • Jou IM
        • Su FC.
        Jigless knotless internal brace versus other open Achilles tendon repairs using a progressive rehabilitation protocol: a biomechanical study.
        BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021; 22: 908
        • Krackow KA.
        The Krackow suture: how, when, and why.
        Orthopedics. 2008; 31: 931
        • Hong CK
        • Lin CL
        • Kuan FC
        • Wang PH
        • Yeh ML
        • Su WR.
        Longer stitch interval in the Krackow stitch for tendon graft fixation leads to poorer biomechanical property.
        J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2018; 26 (2309499018799514)
        • Akizuki KH
        • Gartman EJ
        • Nisonson B
        • Ben-Avi S
        • McHugh MP.
        The relative stress on the Achilles tendon during ambulation in an ankle immobiliser: implications for rehabilitation after Achilles tendon repair.
        Br J Sports Med. 2001; 35: 329
        • Orishimo KF
        • Burstein G
        • Mullaney MJ
        • Kremenic IJ
        • Nesse M
        • McHugh MP
        • Lee SJ.
        Effect of knee flexion angle on Achilles tendon force and ankle joint plantarflexion moment during passive dorsiflexion.
        J Foot Ankle Surg. 2008; 47: 34
        • Demetracopoulos CA
        • Gilbert SL
        • Young E
        • Baxter JR
        • Deland JT
        Limited-open Achilles tendon repair using locking sutures versus nonlocking sutures: an in vitro model.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2014; 35: 612
        • Heitman DE
        • Ng K
        • Crivello KM
        • Gallina J.
        Biomechanical comparison of the Achillon tendon repair system and the Krackow locking loop technique.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2011; 32: 879
        • Jaakkola JI
        • Hutton WC
        • Beskin JL
        • Lee GP.
        Achilles tendon rupture repair: biomechanical comparison of the triple bundle technique versus the Krakow locking loop technique.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2000; 21: 14
        • Labib SA
        • Rolf R
        • Dacus R
        • Hutton WC.
        The "Giftbox" repair of the Achilles tendon: a modification of the Krackow technique.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2009; 30: 410
        • Lee SJ
        • Sileo MJ
        • Kremenic IJ
        • Orishimo K
        • Ben-Avi S
        • Nicholas SJ
        • McHugh M.
        Cyclic loading of 3 Achilles tendon repairs simulating early postoperative forces.
        Am J Sports Med. 2009; 37: 786
        • Shepard ME
        • Lindsey DP
        • Chou LB.
        Biomechanical testing of epitenon suture strength in Achilles tendon repairs.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2007; 28: 1074
        • Watson TW
        • Jurist KA
        • Yang KH
        • Shen KL.
        The strength of Achilles tendon repair: an in vitro study of the biomechanical behavior in human cadaver tendons.
        Foot Ankle Int. 1995; 16: 191
        • Clanton TO
        • Haytmanek CT
        • Williams BT
        • Civitarese DM
        • Turnbull TL
        • Massey MB
        • Wijdicks CA
        • LaPrade RF.
        A biomechanical comparison of an open repair and 3 minimally invasive percutaneous Achilles tendon repair techniques during a simulated, progressive rehabilitation protocol.
        Am J Sports Med. 2015; 43: 1957
        • Ostrander 3rd, RV
        • Saper MG
        • Juelson TJ.
        A biomechanical comparison of modified krackow and locking loop suture patterns for soft-tissue graft fixation.
        Arthroscopy. 2016; 32: 1384
        • McHugh MP
        • Orishimo KF
        • Kremenic IJ
        • Adelman J
        • Nicholas SJ.
        Electromyographic evidence of excessive Achilles tendon elongation during isometric contractions after Achilles tendon repair.
        Orthop J Sports Med. 2019; 7 (2325967119883357)