Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 62, ISSUE 2, P228-236, March 2023

An Analysis of 50 Consecutive Total Ankle Replacements Undergoing Preoperative Computerized Tomography Scan-Based, Engineer-Provided Planning From a Single Noninventor, Nonconsultant Surgeon

  • Garrett Biela
    Correspondence
    Address correspondence to: Garrett Biela, DPM, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation, University of Florida College of Medicine-Jacksonville, 655 W 8th Street, Jacksonville, FL 32209.
    Affiliations
    Post-Graduate Year 2 Resident, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation, Foot & Ankle Service Line, University of Florida College of Medicine-Jacksonville, Jacksonville, FL
    Search for articles by this author
  • Jason Piraino
    Affiliations
    Associate Professor, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation, Chairman, Foot & Ankle Service Line, University of Florida College of Medicine-Jacksonville, Jacksonville, FL
    Search for articles by this author
  • Thomas S. Roukis
    Affiliations
    Professor, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation, Foot & Ankle Service Line, University of Florida College of Medicine-Jacksonville, Jacksonville, FL
    Search for articles by this author

      Abstract

      Preoperative computerized tomography (CT) scan-based, engineer-provided alignment plans and patient-specific pinning blocks for total ankle replacement (TAR) are available for use in the United States. However, nonbiased studies that justify the additional expense associated with this technology through support of the marketed benefits of less procedural complexity, less intraoperative radiation and reduced surgical time, are lacking. Therefore, to verify the manufacturer's proposed benefits, we sought to investigate our experience with this preoperative CT scan-based, engineer-provided plan and patient-specific pinning blocks during primary TAR. In review of our 50 TAR patients, we found that “perfect” radiographic alignment was not consistently achieved and the accuracy of component prediction was modest. Furthermore, the preoperative plans and patient-specific pinning blocks did not simplify the complexity of our operations since the operative time, intraoperative image intensification time and radiation dose per case all exceeded published historical TAR controls. Interestingly, we identified a significant difference in placement accuracy between the arced and flat-top talar component types that were implanted with the arced being more frequently malaligned. We did not find associations between preoperative deformity severity and accuracy of postoperative alignment. These findings suggest that it is imperative to have surgeons continue to rely on their own surgical planning and experience to achieve optimum radiographic alignment rather than depending on engineer-based recommendations or “surface matched” pinning blocks. Ultimately, we were unable to support the purported benefits of this CT scan-based, engineer-provided alignment plan and patient-specific pinning blocks for this manufacturer's primary TAR systems.

      Level of Clinical Evidence

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Tochigi Y
        • Rudert MJ
        • Brown TD
        • McIff TE
        • Saltzman CL
        The effect of accuracy of implantation on range of movement of the Scandinavian Total Ankle Replacement.
        J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005; 87: 736-740
        • Espinosa N
        • Walti M
        • Favre P
        • Snedeker JG.
        Misalignment of total ankle components can induce high joint contact pressures.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010; 92: 1179-1187
        • Barg A
        • Elsner A
        • Anderson AE
        • Hintermann B.
        The effect of three-component total ankle replacement malalignment on clinical outcome: pain relief and functional outcome in 317 consecutive patients.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011; 93: 1969-1978
        • Cenni F
        • Leardini A
        • Cheli A
        • Catani F
        • Belvedere C
        • Romagnoli M
        • Giannini S.
        Position of the prosthesis components in total ankle replacement and the effect on motion at the replaced joint.
        Int Orthop. 2012; 36: 571-578
        • Queen RM
        • Adams Jr, SB
        • Viens NA
        • Friend JK
        • Easley ME
        • DeOrio JK
        • Nunley JA.
        Differences in outcomes following total ankle replacement in patients with neutral alignment compared with tibiotalar joint malalignment.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013; 95: 1927-1934
        • Braito M
        • Dammerer D
        • Reinthaler A
        • Kaufmann G
        • Huber D
        • Biedermann R.
        Effect of coronal and sagittal alignment on outcome after mobile-bearing total ankle replacement.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2015; 36: 1029-1037
        • Usuelli FG
        • Maccario C
        • Manzi L
        • Tan EW.
        Posterior talar shifting in mobile-bearing total ankle replacement.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2016; 37: 281-287
        • Grier AJ
        • Schmitt AC
        • Adams Jr, SB
        • Queen RM
        The effect of tibiotalar alignment on coronal plane mechanics following total ankle replacement.
        Gait Posture. 2016; 48: 13-18
        • Le V
        • Escudero M
        • Symes M
        • Salat P
        • Wing K
        • Younger A
        • Penner M
        • Veljkovic A.
        Impact of sagittal talar inclination on total ankle replacement failure.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2019; 40: 900-904
        • de Keijzer DR
        • Joling BSH
        • Sierevelt IN
        • Hoornenborg D
        • Kerkhoffs GMMJ
        • Haverkamp D.
        Influence of preoperative tibiotalar alignment in the coronal plane on the survival of total ankle replacement: a systematic review.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2020; 41: 160-169
        • Mauldin RG
        • Bradfish C.
        3D orthopaedic pre-operative surgical planning for total ankle replacement.
        in: Roukis TS Hyer CF Berlet GC Bibbo C Penner MJ Primary and Revision Total Ankle Replacement: Evidence-Based Surgical Management. 2nd ed. Springer Nature Switzerland AG, Switzerland2021: 93-106 (In:)
        • Santrock RD
        • Neufeld SK
        • Scott RT
        • Hyer CF
        • Berlet GC
        INBONE™ II total ankle replacement system including PROPHECY™ specific alignment guides.
        in: Roukis TS Hyer CF Berlet GC Bibbo C Penner MJ Primary and Revision Total Ankle Replacement: Evidence-Based Surgical Management. 2nd ed. Springer Nature Switzerland AG, Switzerland2021: 123-136
        • Prissel MA
        • Daigre JL
        • Penner MJ
        • Berlet GC
        INFINITY™ total ankle replacement including PROPHECY ™patient-specific alignment guides.
        in: Roukis TS Hyer CF Berlet GC Bibbo C Penner MJ Primary and Revision Total Ankle Replacement: Evidence-Based Surgical Management. 2nd ed. Springer Nature Switzerland AG, Switzerland2021: 137-150
        • Penner MJ
        • Berlet GC
        • Calvo R
        • Molina E
        • Reynolds D
        • Stemniski P
        • Davis WH.
        The demographics of total ankle replacement in the USA: a study of 21,222 cases undergoing pre-operative CT scan-based planning.
        Foot Ankle Orthop. 2020; 52473011420S00381
        • Berlet GC
        • Penner MJ
        • Lancianese S
        • Stemniski PM
        • Obert RM.
        Total ankle arthroplasty accuracy and reproducibility using preoperative CT scan-derived, patient specific guides.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2014; 35: 665-676
        • Hsu AR
        • Davis WH
        • Cohen BE
        • Jones CP
        • Ellington JK
        • Anderson RB.
        Radiographic outcomes of preoperative CT scan-derived patient-specific total ankle arthroplasty.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2015; 36: 1163-1169
        • Werner S
        • Brage M.
        Comparison of two operative techniques for total ankle arthroplasty: intramedullary referencing vs CT scan-derived patient-specific guides.
        Foot Ankle Orthop. 2016; 1: 665-676
        • Daigre J
        • Berlet G
        • Van Dyke B
        • Peterson KS
        • Santrock R.
        Accuracy and reproducibility using patient-specific instrumentation in total ankle arthroplasty.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2017; 38: 412-418
        • Saito GH
        • Sanders AE
        • Sturnick DR
        • Demetracopoulos CA.
        Use of CT scan-derived patient-specific instrumentation in total ankle arthroplasty.
        Tech Foot Ankle Surg. 2017; 16: 183-189
        • Saito GH
        • Sanders AE
        • O'Malley MJ
        • Deland JT
        • Ellis SJ
        • Demetracopoulos CA
        Accuracy of patient-specific instrumentation in total ankle arthroplasty: a comparative study.
        Foot Ankle Surg. 2019; 25: 383-389
        • Ge S
        • Barimani B
        • Epure LM
        • Aoude A
        • Luo L
        • Volesky M
        • Chaytor RE
        Accuracy and radiologic outcomes of patient specific instrumentation for total ankle arthroplasty.
        Orthop Proc. 2020; 102-B
        • April P-M
        • Champagne PH
        • Angers M
        • Lalonde K-AR
        • Meulenkamp B
        • Martinez AP
        • Seidel A
        Accuracy and reproducibility of a patient-specific instrumentation in total ankle arthroplasty.
        Foot Ankle Orthop. 2020; 52473011420S00107
        • Escudero MI
        • Symes M
        • Bemenderfer TB
        • Barahona M
        • Anderson R
        • Davis WH
        • Wing KJ
        • Penner MJ.
        Does patient-specific instrumentation have a higher rate of early osteolysis than standard referencing techniques in total ankle arthroplasty? A radiographic analysis.
        Foot Ankle Spec. 2020; 13: 32-42
        • Giardini P
        • Di Benedetto P
        • Mercurio D
        • Gisonni R
        • Molinari M
        • Causero A
        • Cortese F
        INFINITY™ ankle arthroplasty with traditional instrumentation and PSI PROPHECY™ system: preliminary results.
        Acta Biomed. 2020; 91e2020021
        • Escudero MI
        • Le V
        • Bemenderfer TB
        • Barahona M
        • Anderson RB
        • Davis WH
        • Wing KJ
        • Penner MJ.
        Total ankle arthroplasty radiographic alignment comparison between patient-specific instrumentation and standard instrumentation.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2021; 42: 851-858
      1. Albagli A, Mengxiao S, Park P, Cohen D, Epure L, Chaytor RE, Volesky M. Total ankle arthroplasty results using fixed bearing CT-guided patient specific implants in post-traumatic versus non-traumatic arthritis. Foot Ankle Surg In-press corrected proof, available online March 24, 2021. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2021.03.015.

        • Hamid KS
        • Matson AP
        • Nwachukwu BU
        • Scott DJ
        • Mather 3rd, RC
        • DeOrio JK.
        Determining the cost-savings threshold and alignment accuracy of patient-specific instrumentation in total ankle replacements.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2017; 28: 49-57
        • Savage-Elliott I
        • Wu VJ
        • Wu I
        • Heffernan JT
        • Rodriguez R.
        Comparison of time and cost savings using different cost methodologies for patient-specific instrumentation vs standard referencing in total ankle arthroplasty.
        Foot Ankle Orthop. 2019; 42473011419884278
        • Wood PLR
        • Prem H
        • Sutton C.
        Total ankle replacement: medium-term results in 200 Scandinavian total ankle replacements.
        J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008; 90: 605-609
        • Wrixon AD.
        New ICRP recommendations.
        J Radiol Prot. 2008; 28: 161-168
        • Roukis TS
        • Iceman KL
        • Elliott AD.
        Intra-operative radiation exposure during revision total ankle replacement.
        J Foot Ankle Surg. 2016; 55: 732-737
        • Angthong C
        • Adams SB
        • Easley ME
        • DeOrio JK
        • Nunley JA.
        Radiation exposure in total ankle replacement.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2014; 35: 1131-1136
        • Khan IA
        • Kamalasekaran S
        • Faza MA.
        Risk of ionizing radiation to trainee orthopaedic surgeons.
        Acta Orthop Belg. 2012; 78: 106-110
        • Najefi A-A
        • Goldberg A.
        The role of axial rotation in total ankle replacement.
        Foot Ankle Orthop. 2018; 3: 1358-1367
        • Gagne OJ
        • Veljkovic A
        • Townshend D
        • Younger A
        • Wing KJ
        • Penner MJ.
        Intraoperative assessment of the axial rotational positioning of a modern ankle arthroplasty tibial component using pre-operative patient-specific instrumentation guidance.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2019; 40: 1160-1165
        • Hintermann B
        • Susdorf R
        • Krähenbühl N
        • Ruiz R.
        Axial rotational alignment of mobile-bearing total ankle arthroplasty.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2020; 41: 521-528
        • Ciudo DJ
        • Baker EA
        • Fortin PT.
        Tibial torsion may predict morphology of the talus.
        Foot Ankle Orthop. 2020; 52473011420S00171
        • Leemrijse T
        • Paul L
        • Ågren P-H
        • Putzeys P
        • Cooper MT
        • Besse J-L
        The QUANTUM™ total ankle prosthesis.
        in: Roukis TS Hyer CF Berlet GC Bibbo C Penner MJ Primary and Revision Total Ankle Replacement: Evidence-Based Surgical Management. 2nd ed. Springer Nature Switzerland AG, Switzerland2021: 123-136