Efficacy of Far Cortical Locking Screws in Treating Distal Tibia Fractures in Comparison With That of Standard Locking Screws

Published:October 27, 2022DOI:


      There are no clinical studies about treatment of distal tibia fractures using far cortical locking (FCL) screws, even though it has been shown to be superior to standard locking screws in biomechanical studies. We compared the efficacy of FCL screws to that of traditional locking screws. Twenty-five distal tibia fractures were treated with minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis using traditional locking screws, whereas 20 were treated using FCL screws. We retrospectively compared time taken for callus formation and radiographic bone union between 2 groups. The effect of age, sex, diabetes, and smoking history on bone healing was analyzed. Complications were also noted. As a result, there was no significant difference in age (p = .292), sex (p = 1.0), diabetes (p = 1.0), or smoking history (p = .704) between 2 groups. Time to callus formation was 77.5 days in the FCL group, and 96 days in the traditional group (p = .023). Average time to bone union was 134.8 days, and 163.1 days in the FCL group and the traditional group, respectively (p = .017). There was one case of screw loosening in the FCL group, and one case of screw breakage in the traditional group. This study suggests that FCL screws promote quicker healing of distal tibia fractures than traditional locking screws.

      Level of Clinical Evidence


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Shukla R
        • Jain N
        • Jain RK
        • Patidar S
        • Kiyawat V.
        Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis using locking plates for AO 43-type fractures: lessons learnt from a prospective study.
        Foot Ankle Spec. 2018; 11: 236-241
        • Larsen P
        • Elsoe R
        • Hansen SH
        • Graven-Nielsen T
        • Laessoe U
        • Rasmussen S.
        Incidence and epidemiology of tibial shaft fractures.
        Injury. 2015; 46: 746-750
        • Ronga M
        • Longo UG
        • Maffulli N.
        Minimally invasive locked plating of distal tibia fractures is safe and effective.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010; 468: 975-982
        • Bhat R
        • Wani MM
        • Rashid S
        • Akhter N.
        Minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis for closed distal tibial fractures: a consecutive study based on 25 patients.
        Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2015; 25 (4): 563-568
        • Wenger R
        • Oehme F
        • Winkler J
        • Perren SM
        • Babst R
        • Beeres FJP.
        Absolute or relative stability in minimal invasive plate osteosynthesis of simple distal meta or diaphyseal tibia fractures?.
        Injury. 2017; 48: 1217-1223
        • Bahari S
        • Lenehan B
        • Khan H
        • McElwain JP.
        Minimally invasive percutaneous plate fixation of distal tibia fractures.
        Acta Orthop Belg. 2007; 73: 635-640
        • Bottlang M
        • Doornink J
        • Lujan TJ
        • Fitzpatrick DC
        • Marsh JL
        • Augat P
        • von Rechenberg B
        • Lesser M
        • Madey SM.
        Effects of construct stiffness on healing of fractures stabilized with locking plates.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010; 92: 12-22
        • Adams JD
        • Tanner SL
        • Jeray KJ
        Far cortical locking screws in distal femur fractures.
        Orthopedics. 2015; 38: e153-e156
        • Bottlang M
        • Doornink J
        • Fitzpatrick DC
        • Madey SM.
        Far cortical locking can reduce stiffness of locked plating constructs while retaining construct strength.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009; 91: 1985-1994
        • Doornink J
        • Fitzpatrick DC
        • Madey SM
        • Bottlang M.
        Far cortical locking enables flexible fixation with periarticular locking plates.
        J Orthop Trauma. 2011; 25: S29-S34
        • Henschel J
        • Tsai S
        • Fitzpatrick DC
        • Marsh JL
        • Madey SM
        • Bottlang M.
        Comparison of 4 methods for dynamization of locking plates: differences in the amount and type of fracture motion.
        J Orthop Trauma. 2017; 31: 531-537
        • Kidiyoor B
        • Kilaru P
        • Rachakonda KR
        • Joseph VM
        • Subramaniam GV
        • Sankineani SR
        • Nugur A
        • Gurava Reddy AV.
        Clinical outcomes in periarticular knee fractures with flexible fixation using far cortical locking screws in locking plate: a prospective study.
        Musculoskelet Surg. 2019; 103: 149-153
        • Rice C
        • Christensen T
        • Bottlang M
        • Fitzpatrick D
        • Kubiak E.
        Treating tibia fractures with far cortical locking implants.
        Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2016; 45: E143-E147
        • Whelan DB
        • Bhandari M
        • Stephen D
        • Kreder H
        • McKee MD
        • Zdero R
        • Schemitsch EH.
        Development of the radiographic union score for tibial fractures for the assessment of tibial fracture healing after intramedullary fixation.
        J Trauma. 2010; 68: 629-632
        • Hente R
        • Fuchtmeier B
        • Schlegel U
        • Ernstberger A
        • Perren SM.
        The influence of cyclic compression and distraction on the healing of experimental tibial fractures.
        J Orthop Res. 2004; 22: 709-715