Review Article| Volume 62, ISSUE 2, P398-404, March 2023

Effectiveness of Arthroscopically Assisted Surgery for Ankle Arthrodesis

Published:December 16, 2022DOI:


      Regarding the treatment of ankle arthritis, the choice of arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis (AAA) or open ankle arthrodesis (OAA) remains controversial. To guide clinical decision-making, we conducted a meta-analysis on the optimal treatment of ankle arthrodesis. We identified eligible studies published from June 1, 1969 to June 1, 2020 using the Cochrane Library, PubMed, OVID, Embase, and Medline searched the references of relevant studies. Randomized and non-randomized studies that compared outcomes of AAA and OAA were included. After the methodologic assessment, available data were extracted and statistically reviewed. The primary outcomes were overall complications rate, tourniquet time, length of the hospital stay, non-union rate, and rate to fusion. The secondary outcomes were delayed union and postoperative infection rate. We included 9 studies comparing arthroscopic and open in patients with ankle arthrodesis, comprising 467 participants. AAA had the advantage of demonstrating a lower overall complication rate (odds ratio [OR], 0.44 [95% confidence interval [CI], 0.26-0.73]; p = .002), shorter intraoperative tourniquet time (mean difference [MD], -16.49 [95% CI, -23.51 to -9.46]; p < .001), shorter length of the hospital stay (MD -1.75, 95% CI -1.94 to -1.2, p < .001),lower non-union rate (OR, -0.07 [95% CI, -0.13 to -0.02]; p <.01) and higher rate to fusion (OR, 4.2 [95% CI, 1.96-8.99]; p < .001) in comparison with OAA. Yet, no significant differences were found in delayed union (OR, 0.46 [95% CI, 0.10-2.04]; p = .30) and postoperative infection rate (OR, 0.45 [95% CI, 0.17-1.15]; p = .09) between the groups. Our results suggest that arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis is superior to open ankle arthrodesis alone in the treatment of ankle arthritis based on the overall complication rate, intraoperative tourniquet time, length of the hospital stay, non-union rate and rate to fusion. However, further high-quality randomized controlled trials with appropriate blinding methods are needed to confirm the findings.

      Level of Clinical Evidence


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Schuh R
        • Hofstaetter J
        • Krismer M
        • Bevoni R
        • Windhager R
        • Trnka HJ
        Total ankle arthroplasty versus ankle arthrodesis. Comparison of sports, recreational activities and functional outcome.
        Int Orthop. 2012; 36: 1207-1214
        • Anderson DD
        • Van Hofwegen C
        • Marsh JL
        • Brown TD
        Is elevated contact stress predictive of post-traumatic osteoarthritis for imprecisely reduced tibial plafond fractures?.
        J Orthop Res. 2011; 29: 33-39
        • Ferguson Z
        • Anugraha A
        • Janghir N
        • Pillai A
        Ankle arthrodesis: a long term review of the literature.
        J Orthop. 2019; 16: 430-433
        • Kennedy JG
        • Hodgkins CW
        • Brodsky A
        • Bohne WH
        Outcomes after standardized screw fixation technique of ankle arthrodesis.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006; 447: 112-118
        • Jordan RW
        • Chahal GS
        • Chapman A
        Is end-stage ankle arthrosis best managed with total ankle replacement or arthrodesis? A systematic review.
        Adv Orthop. 2014; 2014986285
        • Stone JW
        Arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis.
        Foot Ankle Clin. 2006; 11: 361-368
        • Glazebrook MA
        • Ganapathy V
        • Bridge MA
        • Stone JW
        • Allard JP
        Evidence-based indications for ankle arthroscopy.
        Arthroscopy. 2009; 25: 1478-1490
      1. Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Higgins DG, Altman JP, eds. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Version 5.0.1.Updated September 2008]. Available at: Accessed May 15.

        • Stang A
        Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses[J].
        Eur. J. Epidemiol. 2010; 25: 603-605
        • Liberati A
        • Altman DG
        • Tetzlaff J
        • Mulrow C
        • Gøtzsche PC
        • Ioannidis JPA
        • Mike C
        • Jos K
        The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 2009; 62: e15-e34
        • Townshend D
        • Di Silvestro M
        • Krause F
        • Penner M
        • Younger A
        • Glazebrook M
        • Wing K
        Arthroscopic versus open ankle arthrodesis: a multicenter comparative case series.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013; 95: 98-102
        • Barg A
        • Lyman M
        • Morris SC
        • Saltzman CL
        Primary vs. revision ankle arthrodesis: comparison of fusion and complication rates.
        Foot Ankle Orthop. 2016; 1: 100-101
        • Peterson KS
        • Lee MS
        • Buddecke DE
        Arthroscopic versus open ankle arthrodesis: a retrospective cost analysis.
        J Foot Ankle Surg. 2010; 49: 242-247
        • Youichi Y
        • Vig KS
        • Murawski CD
        • Desai P
        • Savage-Elliott I
        • Kennedy JG
        Open versus arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis: a comparison of subsequent procedures in a large database.
        J Foot Ankle Surg. 2016; 55: 777-781
        • O'Brien TS
        • Hart TS
        • Shereff MJ
        • Stone J
        • Johnson J
        Open versus arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis: a comparative study.
        Foot Ankle Int. 1999; 20: 368-374
        • Nielsen KK
        • Linde F
        • Jensen NC
        The outcome of arthroscopic and open surgery ankle arthrodesis: a comparative retrospective study on 107 patients.
        Foot Ankle Surg. 2008; 14: 153-157
        • Myerson MS
        • Quill G
        Ankle arthrodesis. A comparison of an arthroscopic and an open method of treatment.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991; : 84-95
        • Meng Q
        • Yu T
        • Yu L
        • Zhao X
        • Qi C
        Effectiveness comparison between arthroscopic and open ankle arthrodeses.
        Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2013; 27: 288-289
        • Jonathan Q
        • Roozbeh S
        • Muhammad AK
        • Koushik G
        • Anthony S
        • Nikos G
        Arthroscopic versus open ankle arthrodesis.
        Foot Ankle Surg. 2018; 24: 137-142
        • Alastair Y
        • David N T
        • Matthew D S
        • Murray P
        • Mark G
        • Kevin W
        Prospective comparison of open and arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis using validated outcome score with two-year minimum follow-up (SS-55).
        Arthroscopy. 2011, e59; 27
        • Vivek Panikkar K
        • Taylor A
        • Kamath S
        • Henry A.P.J
        A comparison of open and arthroscopic ankle fusion.
        Foot Ankle Surg. 2003; 9: 169-172
        • Mallikarjun H C
        • Shahin H
        • Shahab H
        Ankle arthrodesis—Open versus arthroscopic: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2017; 8: S71-S77
        • Park J H
        • Kim H J
        • Suh D H
        • Lee J W
        • Kim H J
        • Oh Myung J
        • Choi GW
        Arthroscopic versus open ankle arthrodesis: a systematic review.
        Arthroscopy. 2018; 34: 988-997
        • Glick JM
        • Morgan CD
        • Myerson MS
        • Sampson TG
        • Mann JA.
        Ankle arthrodesis using an arthroscopic method: long-term follow-up of 34 cases.
        Arthroscopy. 1996; 12: 428-434
        • Morgan CD
        • Henke JA
        • Bailey RW
        • Kaufer H.
        Long term results of tibiotalar arthrodesis.
        J. Bone Joint Surg. 1985; 67A: 546-549
        • Kitaoka HB
        • Alexander IJ
        • Adelaar RS
        • Nunley JA
        • Myerson MS
        • Sander M
        Clinical rating systems for the ankle-hindfoot, midfoot, hallux, and lesser toes.
        Foot Ankle Int. 1994; 15: 349-353
        • Ibrahim T
        • Beiri A
        • Azzabi M
        • Menon DK
        • Best AJ
        • Taylor GJ
        • Menon DK
        Reliability and validity of the subjective component of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society clinical rating scales.
        J Foot Ankle Surg. 2007; 46: 65-74